INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: FLAC vs. Wavpack  (Read 8324 times)

Humbledore

  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
FLAC vs. Wavpack
« on: May 27, 2013, 10:15:35 am »

Hi,
regarding the choice between lossless formats; are there any important pros and cons differences between FLAC- and Wavpack files, except for the Wavpack hybrid option?
Thanks!
Logged

6233638

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 5353
Re: FLAC vs. Wavpack
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2013, 10:46:37 am »

Most lossless formats are within about 5% of each other as far as compression is concerned.
How fast it is to compress/decompress can vary quite a bit though.

FLAC/ALAC are the most popular formats because they have good metadata support, and wide hardware support.

I use ALAC because I have a number of Apple devices, and this allows me to copy/stream files on to them without conversion.
Really, that is all that matters—they all sound the same.

As for hybrid lossless/lossy formats, I actually dislike this. I want the format I am using to only support lossless audio.
Logged

Humbledore

  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 272
Re: FLAC vs. Wavpack
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2013, 11:00:51 am »

Thanks, pretty much as I expected then...
Logged

jesseinsf

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 151
  • Who, ME?
Re: FLAC vs. Wavpack
« Reply #3 on: August 27, 2017, 03:35:18 pm »

Can someone please answer this questions instead of ranting on about what they prefer and like?
Logged
OS - Win 11 Pro for Workstation (64-bit)
Monitor - MSI Creator PS321URV 4K UHD HDR600
CPU - Intel Core i9-9900K Up to 5GHz - CPU
GPU - NVidia GeForce RTX 3080TI FE - GPU
MB - Asus Maximus XI Extreme - Motherboard
RAM - 128 GB RAM DDR4 3200 - RAM
SSD - Samsung 980 Pro & 970 Pro m.2 NVMe 1TB each
SP  - Vanatoo TP One Encore (over TOSLink)- REL HT/1003
Pages: [1]   Go Up