More > JRiver Media Center 27 for Windows
Feature Request: Equalizer Improvements
wer:
Thanks for posting, Foggyroad.
I think your post is important because it illustrates that the sort of improvements we are discussing are helpful and necessary not only for less-advanced users with simple sound-shaping needs, but also for users with extremely complicated setups who are leveraging a lot of MC's capabilities.
MC has tremendous capability and quality in its sound modification capabilities, but they could be much better utilized by a broad swath of users if they were more accessible and usable.
JimH:
We'll try to give this some attention after our end-of-year break.
Foggyroad:
--- Quote from: JimH on December 21, 2020, 06:43:21 pm ---We'll try to give this some attention after our end-of-year break.
--- End quote ---
Many thanks for your quick response JimH - this would be brilliant.
Have a safe Christmas everyone!
JunoAudio:
Hello,
Would like to see the option of minimum phase and linear phase for the SoX resampler be implemented.
Please add your filter requirements for your dipole X-over, as an example of functionality required.
Cheers - Have a safe Christmas everyone
Foggyroad:
--- Quote from: JunoAudio on December 25, 2020, 05:18:18 am ---Hello,
Would like to see the option of minimum phase and linear phase for the SoX resampler be implemented.
Please add your filter requirements for your dipole X-over, as an example of functionality required.
Cheers - Have a safe Christmas everyone
--- End quote ---
The functionality to input complex multi-channel x-overs, shelving and peaking filters already exists in JRiver. This works fine and is not the issue for me. It is being able to visualize what has been input that would greatly improve the usability of the DSP PEQ. Avoiding the necessity to calculate the S=Q difference for a shelving filter (depends on frequency) would also be useful.
Personally, I don't need to be able to create linear phase x-overs in JRiver. I own Acourate and can build complex minimum phase or linear phase filters using that and use them in JRiver's via the convolver. However, if for example I want to make a small EQ change on the fly, say for an overbright recording, it is much easier to switch in a high shelf filter in JRiver's PEQ than it is to switch in another filter that has been built in Acourate. Acourate is a very powerful piece of software, but it has a complex interface and just making a small change to an existing configuration takes time. Also, complex multi-channel minimum phase filters built in JRiver have a tiny effect on processor load compared to the exact same filters built in Acourate.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version