Windows > Third Party Plug-ins, Programs, and Skins

beqdesigner: a jriver dsp simulator and editor

<< < (4/17) > >>

jjazdk:
The latest version cannot open my .dsp file.
I use MC 29, but tried with 28, 29 and 30, same error.

Debug output and screenshot attached.

And, I still get the: Warning: Could not load "C:\Users\humle\AppData\Local\Temp\_MEI421002\gvplugin_pango.dll" - The system cannot find the file specified.

mattkhan:
it's a problem with not handling disabled filters properly when it comes to simulating the response

you can delete the disabled filter (specifically the disabled mix filters) or get 0.11.0-beta.14 once it has built to avoid the problem

it would be interesting to know your speaker setup btw, probably I can suggest how better to use beqd to represent those filters, i.e. generally I would suggest to use the features in beqd to create  filter features and let it translate those in actual MC supported filter types. It's not necessary though, you can just use it to create plain lists of filters instead. For me personally (multiway multisub multichannel setup), my list is really MSO filter set exported from MSO + XO filter + a few extra tweaks on top using GEQ.

jjazdk:
I have deleted all the disabled filters in BEQ, but it still does not show output for my subwoofer channels (channels 13, 14, 15, 16). It seems like something else is making the issue. It shows the response of U1, which I copy to the sub-channels, so part of the sub-filter-routing is simulated.

My setup is:
Fronts 2-way active
Center
Surrounds (left side, right side, center rear)
4 individual subs (Sometimes MSO, sometimes my own parameters)

I intend to adopt one of hulks bass-routings, to get rid of the front+sub => phase issue.

mattkhan:
if I delete the disabled filters in beta13 and select just C13-16, I see the attached which, at first glance (i.e. I didn't examine your filters in detail), seems ok

there are clearly some bugs I don't remember in beta4 which don't play nice with your filter set so just use the latest instead

jjazdk:
Update:
I tried building a simple version that illustrates the issue, and found a difference between beta4 and beta13.

0.11.0-beta.4
Copy L to U1 +6dB
Copy U1 to C13 +0dB
Copy L to C14 +3dB
Here I get no simulated output on C13, but output on C14 simulates correct.

0.11.0-beta.13
Copy L to U1 +6dB
Copy U1 to C13 +0dB
Copy L to C14 +3dB
Here I correct simulated output on both C13 and C14. So something with copy to/from U1 does not simulate in beta4.

Unfortunately beta13 cannot open my MC 29 dsp file, so I will try beta14 when it is ready.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page