More > JRiver Media Center 28 for Windows

NEW: A Better Crossfade

<< < (3/6) > >>

JimH:

--- Quote from: imeric on July 13, 2021, 05:54:12 pm ---... means we will need to mess with tags and specify a crossfade for each and every songs

--- End quote ---
Not unless you want to.  You'll be able to set a default.

imeric:

--- Quote from: JimH on July 13, 2021, 06:07:57 pm ---Not unless you want to.  You'll be able to set a default.

--- End quote ---

Yeah this would work.

So specifying the fadeout type and duration wanted in the tag would work...Tedious but is the best approach. No need for a graphic interface you just trial and error with the song and then save it in the tag...

For example I would set the following Tag for these songs: https://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php/topic,129677.msg901222.html#msg901222  and leave S-Curve (agressive) duration 6s as my default.

Not sure if this is what you mean Jim but I think we have all the cross-fades required already....Just need to make sure we can put BOTH the type and duration in the Tag.

I'd still prefer hoping for a smarter cross-fade for these fast fadeout types but I get it's not easy to implement and all these are a bit different...

JimH:
The graphic image is just a representation of the cross feed you're setting.

I'd like to be able to save and load different settings.

Matt:
Should a track define the in and out used on the next track, or should that track define the out and the new track define the in?

JimH:

--- Quote from: Matt on July 13, 2021, 06:12:48 pm ---Should a track define the in and out used on the next track, or should that track define the out and the new track define the in?

--- End quote ---
My understanding is that track one should fade out while track two begins at full volume.  I'm guessing there will be other opinions, but that's a clear starting point for JRiver to work from.

Does there need to be an option for a gap after the fadeout?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version