That got people reacting.
I think you've missed my point though. I know MJ is a MUCH more full product and is more of a database app than a tagging app and is far better as a database or media jukebox.
My point was more that there are some features that Helium2 has that MJ could really steal (ie the ability to break up a large track into sections that it can recognise, browse etc without chopping the file) and include to make it so that it has everything as good or better than the compeition
I know MJ's designed to be a jukebox as it's main feature not a tagging/ripping/encoding specifc app as such but it could easily match the dedicated programs in a LOT of features very easily so that it is classed as an 'encoding app' or whatever else.
Take encoding for instance - A small GUI interface that built up the command line to pass to the encoder does not take a lot of programming but changes the encoder options from being 'basic options' to suit 'the majority of users' to being able to support any advanced users encoding requirements.
Take mp3 encoding for instance - the actual programming required to add all the options available in lame is pretty much as simple as this:
if(mode == stereo) encodeString = encodeString + s
if(mode == joint stereo) encodeString = encodeString + j
Obviously it's slightly more than that, but it's basically that simple and totally removes the need for programs other than MJ. It makes MJ an 'encoding app'.
Anyway, even that point is slightly off the topic
I was just refering to features in general that the competition might have that MJ doesn't