More > JRiver Media Center 30 for Windows
NEW: Additional video file metadata
lepa:
Cropping is wrong in MC in that case or is the format different besides in different order. I though there should be removal from y (1896) also
zybex:
1632 + 264 = 1896
You: Width, Height, StartX, StartY
MC: StartX , StartY, EndX, EndY
StartY + Height = EndY
jmone:
Nice ;D It's looking pretty good (only tested on "Files" so far but most of my library are BD rips):
- Mastering Display Color Primaries: Now being populated correctly
- Atmos / DTS-X etc: working!
- Video Crop: working well enough for me..... but I'm not personally that worried about this feature yet as I only have 16:9 displays. There are some differences but these are on files with very dark backgrounds (eg a video of a Luna Eclipse etc). The rest are either the same or very close to what I was getting with SOT. Zybex came up with a calculated "Aspect Ratio (Crop)" for SOT and I'd guess that a reworked version of this would pave over any difference between the two methods.
- Speed: I find it perfectly acceptable. Sure it will take a bit to rescan the entire video library but once that is done, it will not be an issue for normal importation and tagging of items
Updated list of what I still see that would be good to have (of which I know are probably on your list)
- BD rip support
- Update the Bitstreaming Option to now also include Atmos/DTS-X etc
- Updating the "Compression" to use the new info (eg show Atmos/DTS-X extensions)
- Scan Type to show Interlaced vs Progressive etc
Hendrik:
--- Quote from: lepa on February 17, 2023, 02:49:03 pm ---Cropping is wrong in MC in that case or is the format different besides in different order. I though there should be removal from y (1896) also
--- End quote ---
zybex is right, our format is a typical video rectangle, which is "left x top x right x bottom", the same format you will see in the JRVR OSD for example. Other tools might provide left/top and width/height, but the result is the same, just a different convention.
1896 is of course already a adjusted number, since the original is 2160. :)
Manfred:
Will the old fields disappear in the future, e.g. Sample Rate vs. Audio Sample Rate?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version