INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Request: Return Duration as hh:mm:ss as 9.0  (Read 1382 times)

JB

  • Regular Member
  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • nothing more to say...
Request: Return Duration as hh:mm:ss as 9.0
« on: November 06, 2003, 12:15:33 pm »

With a playlist or group of selected group of audio files Version 9.0 would display at the bottom of the screen the total duration as hh:mm:ss. Version 9.1 only displays it as, for example 2.7 hrs. I would find it helpful and more accurate to have the other display.
Logged

LonWar

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 2874
Re:Request: Return Duration as hh:mm:ss as 9.0
« Reply #1 on: November 06, 2003, 12:59:41 pm »

Yes, that would come in helpful,

This seems pretty easy to change.
Was there any reason why this was changed in the firstplace?
Logged
-

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42325
  • Shoes gone again!
Re:Request: Return Duration as hh:mm:ss as 9.0
« Reply #2 on: November 06, 2003, 01:27:52 pm »

The new way you only need to deal with one unit instead of multiple units.  Like saying "16.3 gallons" instead of "16 gallons, 5 tablespoons, and 1 teaspoon." (or whatever)

I think it's easier on the brain, but everyone else around here tells me I'm wrong.

So I dunno, but it's easy to change if there is a clear preference.
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

Wile E. One

  • Regular Member
  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 215
Re:Request: Return Duration as hh:mm:ss as 9.0
« Reply #3 on: November 06, 2003, 01:37:23 pm »

People usually find what they are used to using to be the easiest. Most of us don't think about our day only in hours. (Actually.. I can't remember the last time someone said to me... "Meet me at [whereever] in 2.75 hours.")

I suspect this same logic applies to why the US still deals with those silly imperial units....
Logged
Now isn't this just typical of whereever this is?

sraymond

  • Guest
Re:Request: Return Duration as hh:mm:ss as 9.0
« Reply #4 on: November 06, 2003, 01:51:59 pm »

There is a lack of consistency in what we might consider normal...

Quote
"Meet me at [whereever] in 2.75 hours."

And when was the last time someone said to you, "I'll be done in 1 hour, 30 minutes"?  It seems more natural to say "an hour and a half" or "90 minutes".

I propose that we're good at only dividing an hour in half.  Any more (thirds, quarters, tenths) and we prefer minutes.  Tenths are particularly problematic, because intervals of six minutes are not very intuitive.

I've often wondered why we've failed to move from base60 for seconds and minutes and base24 for hours.  Sure, in the days of the sun dial, it was (is?) convenient to divide 360 degrees into 15 degree intervals (for a total of 24 intervals).  But why divide 15 degrees into 0.25 degree intervals (for a total of 60 intervals)?  And why divide 0.25 degrees into 0.004166...  intervals (for a total of another 60 intervals)?

And 60 Hz AC power...  what's up with that?  110 (120?) Volts?

Oh...  but I digress!

Scott-

P.S.  If anyone's taking a vote, I choose hh:mm.

Scott-
Logged

Rands

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 397
  • How am I supposed to enjoy this with you crying?
Re:Request: Return Duration as hh:mm:ss as 9.0
« Reply #5 on: November 06, 2003, 03:30:48 pm »

I also vote for hh:mm:ss.
Logged
Toast goes in the toaster.

LisaRCT

  • Guest
Re:Request: Return Duration as hh:mm:ss as 9.0
« Reply #6 on: November 06, 2003, 03:50:13 pm »

The one at the bottom showing playlist duration really doesn't seem too critical to me, so I can go either way with it, but that "last played 10080 minutes ago" for making smartlistshas got to go.  >:(
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up