More > JRiver Media Center 19 for Windows
NEW: Improved audio analysis and volume leveling (R128)
BigCat:
I am also in the same boat as Jack. I do MP3Gain first (for playing files outside my computer), then analyze from within JRiver. I have long thought that JRiver should add an MP3Gain-like modification during audio analysis. It would save me a lot of effort.
Though I am pretty uneducated about this as well, it would be great if JRMC19 would do this.
MarkCoutinho:
--- Quote from: BigCat on July 25, 2013, 02:19:34 am ---I am also in the same boat as Jack. I do MP3Gain first (for playing files outside my computer), then analyze from within JRiver. I have long thought that JRiver should add an MP3Gain-like modification during audio analysis. It would save me a lot of effort.
Though I am pretty uneducated about this as well, it would be great if JRMC19 would do this.
--- End quote ---
One more guy who does it just like Jack, BigCat etc. I always use MP3Gain first and then MC. Would be great if I could throw MP3Gain away and use just MC for this purpose. Remember, like Jack said: Will MC19 be able to modify the files so they can play normalized outside of MC?
Fred1:
--- Quote from: MarkCoutinho on July 28, 2013, 05:39:20 am ---One more guy who does it just like Jack, BigCat etc. I always use MP3Gain first and then MC. Would be great if I could throw MP3Gain away and use just MC for this purpose. Remember, like Jack said: Will MC19 be able to modify the files so they can play normalized outside of MC?
--- End quote ---
+1
see http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=81626.0
contium:
Can I get some clarification on the Dynamic Range (R128) measurement? I'm trying to understand how this measurement correlates with the dynamic range of the track and the DR value obtained from the Dynamic Range Meter/Dynamic Range Database.
Fore example, Muse's "The Second Law" is a horribly compressed CD:
Track DR Dynamic Range (R128)
1 DR5 7.0 LU
2 DR5 7.4 LU
3 DR6 3.6 LU
4 DR7 11.8 LU
5 DR5 14.2 LU
6 DR5 12.4 LU
7 DR5 5.2 LU
8 DR6 11.3 LU
9 DR6 7.7 LU
10 DR6 8.4 LU
11 DR4 2.3 LU
12 DR6 8.1 LU
13 DR5 13.6 LU
And The Cure's "Kiss Me Kiss Me Kiss Me" which is nice and dynamic:
Track DR Dynamic Range (R128)
1 DR11 8.9 LU
2 DR12 2.7 LU
3 DR12 2.9 LU
4 DR13 5.2 LU
5 DR12 2.6 LU
6 DR13 3.4 LU
7 DR13 3.5 LU
8 DR12 3.0 LU
9 DR11 3.9 LU
10 DR14 3.0 LU
11 DR12 3.0 LU
12 DR12 6.4 LU
13 DR12 2.5 LU
14 DR12 3.5 LU
15 DR12 6.5 LU
16 DR12 3.1 LU
17 DR12 4.5 LU
The R128 is all over the place, tells me nothing about what I might hear and almost seems inverted. Lower LU means more dynamic range? The DR values are much more consistent with what I hear.
6233638:
A higher LU value should indicate higher dynamic range.
Media Center should be following the R128 spec: http://tech.ebu.ch/docs/tech/tech3342.pdf
I've just analyzed the EBU test files, and it seems to be working correctly.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version