INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Audiophoolery whack-a-mole continues  (Read 2945 times)

candycane

  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 29
Audiophoolery whack-a-mole continues
« on: August 18, 2013, 01:35:18 pm »

Another day, another attempt at making up a new definition of bitperfect playback: http://www.audioholics.com/how-to-shop/best-audiophile-music-software

I'm really disappointed that Audioholics has descended into such garbage.  Gene's use of classical audiophoolery phrases and fallacies ("up to the reader to decide", "not everything can be fully explained ", etc) in defending the piece shows more like this is coming.
Logged

kensn

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1352
Re: Audiophoolery whack-a-mole continues
« Reply #1 on: August 18, 2013, 02:34:37 pm »

I thought it was a bit strange that he said "similarly priced"... at his quoted $49 and $129.. I don't find that very similar..
Logged
If(IsEmpty([Coffee Cup]), Coffee, Drink)

Arindelle

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 2772
Re: Audiophoolery whack-a-mole continues
« Reply #2 on: August 18, 2013, 02:53:54 pm »

Thanks this was ... euh ... entertaining  ;D

Following this on the site header ...
Quote
Let our rigorous testing and reviews be your guidelines to A/V equipment
and then reading things like the ratings
Quote
Subjective Sound Quality: x
and
Quote
...some people will hear a tremendous difference while others will not.
not to mention "that-which-shall-not-be-named"
Quote
represents the most technically intelligent software available

I do not know this site, so I will not post my "Subjective Credibility Rating" here.

I sent your link to a friend of mine who as an audio engineer found this one amusing
Quote
If the power supply introduces noise or there is jitter on the square wave this results in a square wave that is not identical to the original

I think you should let the guys at Hydrogen Audio have go at this -- post the link on their forum and they will go ballistic.

Maybe this post could be moved to the forum "Music, Movies, Politics, and Other Cheap Thrills"  ;D

Logged

kstuart

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1955
  • Upgraded to MC22 Master using preorder discount
Re: Audiophoolery whack-a-mole continues
« Reply #3 on: August 26, 2013, 03:12:24 pm »

If you are really applying science, then you should avoid "Ad Hominem" attacks.

kstuart

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1955
  • Upgraded to MC22 Master using preorder discount
Re: Audiophoolery whack-a-mole continues
« Reply #4 on: August 26, 2013, 03:18:34 pm »

PS  And the guy in the link, is the only guy who both a) thinks that different music players sound different, and b) does not think that Foobar sounds worse than any of the players he listed. 

InflatableMouse

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3978
Re: Audiophoolery whack-a-mole continues
« Reply #5 on: August 26, 2013, 04:26:02 pm »

Figure this. According to this guy, JRiver is the worst sounding of 'em all ::)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up