INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Slow Encoding  (Read 1253 times)

Robert

  • Guest
Slow Encoding
« on: March 17, 2002, 06:39:22 am »
Encoding with Lame MP3 is very slow compared to MusicMatch encoding.  Is the quality much better?  Is there a faster high-quality way to encode?
Logged

KingSparta

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 20063
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #1 on: March 17, 2002, 07:31:06 am »
MJ8 is faster than 7.2.280, slower than MusicMatch But a better encoding is done by MJ and the Lame encoder
Logged
Retired Military, Airborne, Air Assault, And Flight Wings.
Model Trains, Internet, Ham Radio, Music
https://MyAAGrapevines.com
https://centercitybbs.com
Fayetteville, NC, USA

zevele1

  • Guest
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #2 on: March 17, 2002, 07:46:30 am »
King
what do you think of RealJukebox encoding
Logged

KingSparta

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 20063
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #3 on: March 17, 2002, 07:58:37 am »
I think there was a web site that had Real And Music Match About The Same, both had there problems, and bandwith droped at i think 16khz, the lame encoder did not drop off and went higher.

I think User Z posted the web site, it is a bit dated now (A year old or so).
Logged
Retired Military, Airborne, Air Assault, And Flight Wings.
Model Trains, Internet, Ham Radio, Music
https://MyAAGrapevines.com
https://centercitybbs.com
Fayetteville, NC, USA

Michael Horton

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 776
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #4 on: March 17, 2002, 08:32:39 am »
Doesn't MM use Freuhoffer (spelling?) and Real use Xing? Lame is the slowest mp3 encoder in the galaxy, but is claimed by audiophiles to produce the best sounding mp3 file. If you don't care about sound quality as much, and are just in a hurry to have the songs recorded, you can download Xing or GoGo (the fastest mp3 encoder, I hear) and use them in MJ as an external encoder. Personallly, as far as mp3 goes, I can't tell Frauheufer from Lame. Xing is noticibly bad. Don't know about GoGo.

Michael
Logged

KingSparta

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 20063
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #5 on: March 17, 2002, 08:47:41 am »
GoGo is really no faster than Lame, how ever it does support computers with more than 1 CPU
Logged
Retired Military, Airborne, Air Assault, And Flight Wings.
Model Trains, Internet, Ham Radio, Music
https://MyAAGrapevines.com
https://centercitybbs.com
Fayetteville, NC, USA

zevele1

  • Guest
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #6 on: March 17, 2002, 08:49:39 am »
My question cause i was a RealJuke box user for years
I was quite happy with it.Exept than the sound is not that great.Anyway,for playing only .i used FreeAmp
Do anyone has the feeling that 8 sounds much better than 7.2?Or it is just me having kind of hallucination

Listening to israelis songs--beurk!
Logged

Michael Horton

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 776
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #7 on: March 17, 2002, 08:52:24 am »
KingSparta

Wasn't one of the mp3 encoders supposed to be significantly faster than the others? Was it Xing then, rather than GoGo? Out of curiosity, are there mp3 encoders other than Lame, Xing, GoGo and the one with the German name that I can never remember how to spell?
Logged

KingSparta

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 20063
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #8 on: March 17, 2002, 09:02:04 am »
there are many encoders that are out, some for programers only as a OCX or DLL to be placed in your Visual C Or Visual Basic MP3 Program.

Xing is owned by real networks now (they bought out Xing technologies over a year ago)
Logged
Retired Military, Airborne, Air Assault, And Flight Wings.
Model Trains, Internet, Ham Radio, Music
https://MyAAGrapevines.com
https://centercitybbs.com
Fayetteville, NC, USA

ZRocker

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1257
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #9 on: March 17, 2002, 10:16:01 am »
Logged

zevele1

  • Guest
RE:Slow Encoding
« Reply #10 on: March 17, 2002, 12:20:18 pm »
Thank you for such a link!I have to read for the next coming days
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »