INTERACT FORUM
More => Old Versions => JRiver Media Center 24 for Windows => Topic started by: stanzani on February 28, 2018, 03:40:05 am
-
I will upgrade to MC24 for sure, at least to support this great product which sells at reasonable price
Saying that, I am asking about
- MQA decoding?
- select subtitles somewhere else than OSD when in DLNA?
thanks much and keep on the great work
-
Our stance towards MQA has not changed.
-
Saying that, I am asking about
- MQA decoding?
I don't work for JRiver, but they aren't going to license or work on reverse-engineering the format.
Once there is an open-source decoder, they might consider adding support.
I would say that your questions are better directed toward the companies trying to con you into buying a lossy closed-source high-res format when several very good and open-source lossless compression formats already exist.
-
I'd be highly surprised to see an open-source MQA decoder anytime soon. Even if one existed and JRiver (or another paid/commercial software application) added it, it's possible they could open themselves up to a lawsuit from Meridian for not licensing.
I would say that your questions are better directed toward the companies trying to con you into buying a lossy closed-source high-res format when several very good and open-source lossless compression formats already exist.
This. IMO, MQA is the best example of audiophile snake oil right now.
-
I basically agree with the opinions about MQA exposed here . I just wanted to better understand what the situation is now. thanks
-
MQA is a clever rip-off to make money by degrading quality! And some people believe in it.
I am however a bit more clever than the marketing guys of MQA and recognized it as a pur joke and vodoo.
Peter
-
I will upgrade to MC24 for sure, at least to support this great product which sells at reasonable price
Saying that, I am asking about
- MQA decoding?
- select subtitles somewhere else than OSD when in DLNA?
thanks much and keep on the great work
Don't forget that stanzani started out with two questions. The 2nd didn't get a response.
Posting a reply now gives me an MQA opportunity - I found this view posted by Jim Collinson of Linn to be a great, non-audiophile way of critiquing MQA:
https://www.linn.co.uk/blog/mqa-is-bad-for-music (https://www.linn.co.uk/blog/mqa-is-bad-for-music)
As is often the case, following the money provides considerable insight into the agenda. For homework, search out the pieces posted by Archimago where he reports on a global (thanks internet) ABX test.
EDIT:
This link looks interesting (I haven't read it yet ... I'm being demanded to show an appearance elsewhere) -
https://www.computeraudiophile.com/ca/reviews/mqa-a-review-of-controversies-concerns-and-cautions-r701/ (https://www.computeraudiophile.com/ca/reviews/mqa-a-review-of-controversies-concerns-and-cautions-r701/)
-
Our stance towards MQA has not changed.
Good to know.
I'd expressly request that you please do NOT spend ANY dev time on this nonsense. Very disappointing/sad to see Meridian do this on so many levels. It’s as though they sacked all their amazing engineers and recruited a bunch of MBAs to establish their technology strategy.
-
Saying that, I am asking about
- select subtitles somewhere else than OSD when in DLNA?
You raised this before. Did you try this;
https://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php/topic,114469.msg792452.html#msg792452
See also;
https://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php/topic,113845.msg786814.html#msg786814
Plus search the forum for "Present Subtitle Resources".
-
yes I tried and looks ok
I was just asking for an easier way so the unexperienced user does not have to dig into the advanced DLNA options deeply buried in the setup
-
For these unfamiliar with Archimago blog -
https://www.computeraudiophile.com/ca/reviews/mqa-a-review-of-controversies-concerns-and-cautions-r701/
-
If I can play Master Files (MQA) in Tidal with MC and its WDM driver without sound artifacts, I will upgrade to MC24 in a heart-beat.
-- WW
-
MC doesn't support MQA.
-
Jim, you are correct and it is not needed since Tidal does the first unfolding for you (they support first level of MQA). What would be great if the output could be consumed by MC (24/96kHz) without artifacts (hissing and cracking noises). This way folks who like MQA can still use MC as the sound output/modulator. Best of both worlds :)
-
My sentiments exactly // TG
Jim, you are correct and it is not needed since Tidal does the first unfolding for you (they support first level of MQA). What would be great if the output could be consumed by MC (24/96kHz) without artifacts (hissing and cracking noises). This way folks who like MQA can still use MC as the sound output/modulator. Best of both worlds :)