INTERACT FORUM
More => Old Versions => Media Center 11 (Development Ended) => Topic started by: bennyd on June 13, 2003, 03:14:32 am
-
Is JRiver silently building iTunes for Windows ?
Agreement with Apple ? :-)
-
There was talk about this at one stage. It would be ncie to think so... Only problem I foresee is the fact that MC is so much better than iTunes for Mac in other areas than just the GUI
Adam
-
Quote from ZDNET:
Soon you won't need a Mac to strike up your iTunes.
Apple Computer is developing a version of its jukebox software for Microsoft Windows-based PCs. According to a job posting on the company's Web site, it is looking for someone to design and build "Apple's newest Consumer Application, iTunes for Windows."
The Mac maker said on Monday that it would extend its music service to Windows-based machines by the end of the year, but did not explicitly say that it would do so through a Windows version of its iTunes. The service, named iTunes Music Store, is currently only available to Macs.
When Apple released its iPod for Windows, it chose to bundle jukebox software from MusicMatch with the portable MP3 player rather than to release a version of iTunes for the Microsoft operating system.
Nonetheless, the iTunes application is an integral part of the Mac version of the music service, being the software that allows people to play music, buy songs and transfer them to an iPod. In order to sell music to play on Windows machines, Apple clearly needs either its own software or another program to fulfill these functions and to manage copying restrictions.
An Apple representative declined to comment further on the company's plans for iTunes and Windows.
In the Mac-only version of iTunes Music Store, Apple offers more than 200,000 tracks, with most songs selling for 99 cents apiece and many albums available for $9.99. Those who buy music can use it on up to three computers and download it to an iPod. Songs can also be burned to any number of CDs, though only 10 copies of any one mix of tracks may be made.
-
Interesting!!
Who knows then. Lets just hope that it can still be called MC and doesn't have to change its name to Apple iTunes for Windows...,YAWN!
Adam
-
We don't need another iTunes clone >:(
We need an MC that is truly unique... one that stands alone, is a leader, does it all better then the "other" guys.
If we wanted to use clones we would make everything Microsoft's way and who want that ?
I want MC to be a one-of-a-kind, stand out best of bread player that I can be truly proud of and not another look-alike.
After all, we buy software because of its uniqueness and not because of its sameness.
-
We don't need another iTunes clone >:(
I agree, but JRiver is also in business to make money, and that would be an opportunity too great to pass up.
-
So... iTunes is now the leader?
-
Just because it may look like iTunes doesn't mean it's a clone.
iTunes has a hella nice GUI. I've always wanted a program that looked like iTunes but worked like MC. MC is outstanding software, but the learning curve is a pain in the butt, and I'm not the only one that's been thinking that. J River has listened and has begun to totally re-do the MC9 user experience, and I think that the changes are totally positive. Guess I got my wish, eh?
To further prove that MC9 is not a "clone" all one has to do is take a gander at iTunes'
- smartlists (much more limiting than MC9)
- format playback support
- TV-Tuner (not in iTunes)
- Video playback capabilities (not in iTunes)
- HTPC front-end (not in iTunes)
- Media Server (not in iTunes)
- variety of handheld support (try hooking up a Zen to iTunes)
- skinning support (not essential, but still not in iTunes)
- party mode (not in iTunes)
I could go on if y'all want, but I think I've proved my point. MC9 and iTunes are similar in looks and purpose only. That's where the similiarities end.
And again, Apple is coming out with iTunes for Windows. iPod users are going to finally have good software out of the box to use on their PCs (iPods currently ship with MMJB). MC9 can give these users the same UI with a MUCH more powerful engine and tons of additional features. I think it's grand.
-
>> So... iTunes is now the leader?
maybe, only because of current hype on major media sources
Apple can't get there computer system and software in major retail stores. or sale computers in numbers to increase there market share.
They have been working on that for years and years
-
So... iTunes is now the leader?
Only for the Macs. On the PC's I think you'll find that Winamp is probably #1 with MusicMatch, WMP and MC falling somewhere behind.
It irritates me to no end to keep seeing MusicMatch get all these bundling contracts, like with the iPod and Dell PC's.
-
Don't forget all those mobile players bundled with MusicMatch (Urghhh!)....Why? Oh lord, tell me why...
-
>>> I agree, but JRiver is also in business to make money, and that would be an opportunity to big to pass up. <<<
I agree with that, however I always thought that it was innovation (and marketing) that sales & not simply making a look-alike product.
Mercedes sales a lot of luxury cars because they are truly innovative & don't really care to "keep up with the crowd". As a result they have a very loyal following that is willing to pay "top dollar" for the best.
That's where I think MC should be
-
Just wait till somebody whips up an iTunes skin...
-
Hmmm.... I think I may have just given myself an idea. :P
Anybody with a Mac out there that would be willing to send me a full size screenshot?
-
Sorry for the virtual diarhea here, but I was just watching some of the videos on iTunes...
Their smartlist wizard is EXACTLY what I wished MC's had turned out to be. That's just beautiful design right there...
-
Good god, they just added DVD Burning to MC9!!
Who still thinks it's an iTunes clone? I disagree 100%.
-
Definitely not a clone. Just because the top-most portion of MC was obviously influenced by iTunes, that's about where the similarity ends.
Still... there seem to be some things worth looking at there.