INTERACT FORUM

More => Old Versions => Media Center 11 (Development Ended) => Topic started by: forresto on March 10, 2003, 08:04:32 pm

Title: why not a larger buffer?
Post by: forresto on March 10, 2003, 08:04:32 pm
I would like to commit 20mb of ram to the buffer, about 20 minutes of -q 4 oggs, so that the HD does not need to be accessed all the time.

As of now, the maximum buffer size is 5 seconds.

In the future, can we set the buffer to be much larger?

PS great product
Title: Re: why not a larger buffer?
Post by: michel on March 10, 2003, 10:32:28 pm
I second that. Sometimes I have three simultaneous "playing now" (media server and two clients) so I would like reduce HD head moves using a little bit larger buffer.
Title: Re: why not a larger buffer?
Post by: Zoner on March 10, 2003, 10:32:50 pm
Also, a smarter buffer.  I haven't played around much with this in MC9, but in most programs the buffer is "dumb" in that if you have a 20-second buffer, then the song starts playing 20 seconds after you hit play.  This is of course ridiculous - the song should start (and stop) instantly, and the buffer should fill in the background to a limit of X seconds.
Title: Re: why not a larger buffer?
Post by: KingSparta on March 11, 2003, 03:06:32 am
>> so that the HD does not need to be accessed
>> all the time.
this is not a good reason, and really is no strain on the HD

a better reason is to maybe overcome some problems some systems may have from time to time.

a 20 meg buffer is a bit overboard


Title: Re: why not a larger buffer?
Post by: nila on March 11, 2003, 04:00:38 am
Not if you have 1Gig of DDR Ram like me King :)

My system is always busy with a LOT going on and frequent hard drive reads and writes. I dont mind commiting this much to keeping my soul calm from my lovely music! :)
Title: Re: why not a larger buffer?
Post by: forresto on March 11, 2003, 05:21:56 am
Less HD access is a good reason if you want to consume less battery juice.

And I second the smart buffer comment.
Title: Re: why not a larger buffer?
Post by: forresto on March 11, 2003, 07:44:08 am
Quote
Less HD access is a good reason if you want to consume less battery juice.


Like an ipod...