INTERACT FORUM

More => Old Versions => Media Jukebox => Topic started by: jolo on December 20, 2002, 07:32:29 pm

Title: A got Best decoding/burning ?
Post by: jolo on December 20, 2002, 07:32:29 pm

:o
A hot topic going on on another forum is about differences in decoding and burning MP3s to CDA.
Apparently Nero does not do a good job and have to go to .wav first.
It appears the Fuerio and MJ seem be really good.

Any feeling about how it does decoding MP3s as compared to Fuerio or other products ?

Title: Re: A got Best decoding/burning ?
Post by: KingSparta on December 21, 2002, 03:02:42 am

Quote

Nero does not do a good job and have to go to .wav first.

that does not mean it does not do a good job.


Listening to: 'In My House' from 'Only Four You' by 'Mary Jane Girls' on Media Jukebox Charted At 07 In 1985

Title: Re: A got Best decoding/burning ?
Post by: jolo on December 21, 2002, 06:47:02 am

Cool picture !!

I was reading some statistics about how Nero does a worse job will more distortion and loss on decoding than others. Sometimes I wonder if these statistics can be picked up bu the human ear.

But,  could you tell me about the decoding techniques of MJ and if there is a comparison to Feurio. I perfer using MJ with its organizational and ease of use on this.

Title: Re: A got Best decoding/burning ?
Post by: JimH on December 21, 2002, 07:30:21 am

Quote

:o
A hot topic going on on another forum is about differences in decoding and burning MP3s to CDA.
Apparently Nero does not do a good job and have to go to .wav first.
It appears the Fuerio and MJ seem be really good.

That's good to hear.  What forum was it?  Do you have a link?