INTERACT FORUM
More => Old Versions => Media Center 11 (Development Ended) => Topic started by: skidoo on November 17, 2003, 09:15:26 pm
-
FYI: The plural of "CD" is not "CD's."
-
You are correct. Whether it's Compact Disks or Certificates of Deposit. A number of years ago, I researched this for an advertisment. It is amazing how often you see it wrong. Not just CDs either, just about any acronym that needs to be made plural will do.
-
You are correct. Whether it's Compact Disks or Certificates of Deposit. A number of years ago, I researched this for an advertisment. It is amazing how often you see it wrong. Not just CDs either, just about any acronym that needs to be made plural will do.
Well, if we're being picky, it's not "compact disks", it's "compact discs", and "CD" isn't an acronym, it's an initialism.
As for the validity of "CD's", I tend to agree that it doesn't look quite right, and I usually use "CDs" myself, but I have the second edition of Diana Hacker's A Writer's Reference (http://dianahacker.com/writersref/), and it indicates that it is correct to use apostrophes for the plural of abbreviations.
If you really want to learn something interesting and appropriate for this thread, click here (http://www.onelook.com/?w=pedantic).
-
(On a side note, I'm drunker'n Hell right now...otherwise I'd likely overlook this thread).
I've always had a pet peeve with apostrophes and initialisms. Never heard of this Diana Hacker before, but I believe she's bowing to the same social conformance that would would allow the spelling of "e-mail" without a hyphen.
Or is that an en-dash?
Did I mention I'm drunk?
-Doug
-
I wish I could spell 'apostrophes' and 'initialisms' when I'm drunk. I bet you cut and pasted!
-
I'm a technical writer by trade, and I've run across this problem a couple of times. While it is correct to write "CDs" it is also acceptable (though not usual or even encouraged) to write "CD's," the reason being that it's an abbreviation/initialism, and it's distinguishing the plural "s" from being part of the abbreviated form of the word. I certainly don't like it or use it in my writing, but it's technically "acceptable" from what I know.
:)
crow
-
Crowfan is correct.
-
I use apostrophes with abbv's all the time... ;)
Sorry skidoo!
-
God...
-
what is correct: nitpicker or nit-picker ?
-
what is correct: nitpicker or nit-picker ?
:o ;D
crow
-
I certainly don't like it or use it in my writing, but it's technically "acceptable" from what I know.
Read: excused. But still incorrect.
-
Crowfan is correct.
By who's authority? It is incorrect to call something correct (or incorrect, for that matter) without a qualification.
Philips Rubens' "Science and Technical Writing - A Manual if Style" (1992) directs that plurals of initialsms are often indicated by adding a lowercase s to the initialism. He then qualifies that some organizations still prefer an apostrophe before the lowercase s - but cautions, unless required to follow a specific style, to reserve the apostrophe for the possessive case.
So... does that mean that those who use the apostrophe willy-nilly do so: a) out of ignorance, 2) because they're following a specific style, or 3) because they're dinosaurs from a long-ago (twenty years) era?
Scott-
-
Sheesh, and I thought I had too much free time ::)
-
The CD's cover was burned (the single cover of a single CD was burned)
The CDs cover was burned (The single cover of many CDs was burned)
...hmmmmmmm
continue thinking about this or have a beer.... tricky
-
The CDs cover was burned (The single cover of many CDs was burned)
The CDs' cover was burned (the single cover of many CDs was burned).
j
-
When in doubt, spell it out!
"I bought two compact discs today."
-
IMHO the plural of CD is MC... (9.1 of course)
:D
C.
-
I bought a new CD today.
Then, I bought another one.....
-
The CD's cover was burned (the single cover of a single CD was burned)
The CDs cover was burned (The single cover of many CDs was burned)
...hmmmmmmm
continue thinking about this or have a beer.... tricky
After a few beers, a great meal, and half a bottle of merlot, I've come to the conclusion that possessive apostrophes are overrated.
How about: "The cover of the CDs was burned" or "The cover of the CD was burned" or "The covers of the CDs were burned" or ... awww.... I need another glass of wine.
Scott-
-
Don't call me Shirley, but...
The CDs were burned ( many Compact Discs having been produced )
One of the CDs was burnt ( as a result of a bad writer )
The CD covers were printed
The burned CD covers were kept
The burnt CD's cover was thrown...
nick
-
Reading thi's thread i's goin'g to make's people's hair's fall's out, what's the deal's wit's you peep's anyway's?
-
Reading thi's thread i's goin'g to make's people's hair's fall's out, what's the deal's wit's you peep's anyway's?
We're doing our part to ensure that future versions of MediaCenter are grammatically perfect! :)
-Doug
-
What about plural of a single letter? "Ts" or "T's"?
-
aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
-
At a linguists' convention, a speaker ends a long and boring talk with this:
"As I leave you tonight, I want to ask you to think for a while about this: If there are so many double negatives, why is there not even a single double positive?"
Response from the back of the room:
"Yeah..yeah..."
-
What about plural of a single letter? "Ts" or "T's"?
Might a single letter be the ultimate in short initialisms?
Scott-
-
And now that we're all searching through dictionaries, did you know that gullable is the only English word not found in any dictionary?
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=gullable (http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=gullable)
-
And now that we're all searching through dictionaries, did you know that gullable is the only English word not found in any dictionary?
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=gullable (http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=gullable)
Will anyone fall for this? It reminds me of someone's e-mail promising that there's a website where you can find anyone's drivers license photo online. They suggest you first look for your own... and the search returns the photo of a monkey.
Scott-
-
And now that we're all searching through dictionaries, did you know that gullable is the only English word not found in any dictionary?
http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=gullable (http://www.m-w.com/cgi-bin/dictionary?book=Dictionary&va=gullable)
Will anyone fall for this? It reminds me of someone's e-mail promising that there's a website where you can find anyone's drivers license photo online. They suggest you first look for your own... and the search returns the photo of a monkey.
Scott-
Oh, A monkey you say?? :o
I saw that once and wondered :P
-
I was almost gullible enuf to beleive that posting about gullable.
Although the apostrophe usually denotes a possessive, it's also used occasionally as a separator. Without it, the "s" tends to get lumped in as the third initial in a two-initial term- as in "cee dee ess" instead of the pluralization of "cee dee." The apostrophe is a minor infraction of the rules that's permitted because it indicates what the true intention of the "s" really is.
-
The CD's cover was burned (the single cover of a single CD was burned)
The CDs cover was burned (The single cover of many CDs was burned)
How about
The Cd's cover was burn't
The Cd covers were burn't
That sounds okay to me.
-
DougHamm,
That would be a hyphen (e-mail), an en dash is used when connecting a word with a hypenated phrase, e.g. anti–e-mail (sorry, best I could think of).
Cheers!
-
The CD's cover was burned (the single cover of a single CD was burned)
The CDs cover was burned (The single cover of many CDs was burned)
How about
The Cd's cover was burn't
The Cd covers were burn't
That sounds okay to me.
Oh, great, now you want to change the form of the initialism to suit the possessive. In that case, why not just create your own initialism for the plural possessive?
Scott-
P.S. I can't believe this thread has gone on for so long... we really ought to keep DougHamm from drinking!
-
I can't believe this thread has gone on for so long... we really ought to keep DougHamm from drinking!
Nah...when I'm sober I talk about anthropology! This is much more engaging.
-Doug
>hic<
-
The CDs cover was burned (The single cover of many CDs was burned)
The CDs' cover was burned (the single cover of many CDs was burned).
j
William Strunk says it should be:
"The CDs's cover was burned."
http://www.bartleby.com/141/strunk.html#1
Shows that authority and common practice are different things.