INTERACT FORUM

More => Old Versions => Media Center 11 (Development Ended) => Topic started by: Dragyn on August 06, 2004, 08:56:06 am

Title: trees and panes
Post by: Dragyn on August 06, 2004, 08:56:06 am
this is a problem. you can't combine the two. this is just silly.

panes: less clutter, less view schemes, easier access, bypass, etc.
tree/theater:more clutter, more view schemes, harder access, no bypass.

anyone see a difference here? you need a bypass in theater view to make it usable. It's hard to find anything you want to play.

same thing goes for filename (loc). a tree in itself in a pane would work best.

anyone have any ideas?

sorry if I don't make any sense or what not. I haven't been myself lately and things are just going for the worse.



Title: Re:trees and panes
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2004, 10:15:23 am
I'm not sure how panes would fit in theater view.  Remember that it needs to work on resolutions like 640 x 480.

Any cool ideas?
Title: Re:trees and panes
Post by: pipsqueak on August 06, 2004, 11:00:08 am
i dont think we need panes in hairstyle - just need a way to bypass options. How about an artificially inserted 'skip this option' or 'all values' item that is inserted at the top so we can move onto the next option without having to select a value for each?

pip
Title: Re:trees and panes
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2004, 11:24:44 am
That's a really great idea guys.  Look for it in the next build of MC 11.

Thanks :)
Title: Re:trees and panes
Post by: Dragyn on August 06, 2004, 11:41:09 am
thanks matt. much appreciated.

how about the other idea I had concerning file (loc)?

I remember back when panes were first introduced, everyone was complaining about location. that's why (I think) you guys put back the tree (pop) along with the panes.

if you go by tree, you lose the panes and everything in the view scheme for selecting items. even though those items come next in line in the tree I think it would be faster if the tree was in the pane.

right now, it works as double-clicking the folder to go to the next. I'm more of an explorer type and like to see what I'm going through.

Anyway, I thought when you were bringing the tree back, it would be inside. Same thing for playlist groups. I would have to draw a picture to show what I'm getting at but here's a little something:

Filename (loc) | Artist | Album
---------------------------------------
±Parent Directory
.+Folder
..Sub Directories
.+Folder
..Sub Directories
etc

then ctrl click could work for multiple directories that are not in the same directory. everything in mc goes by the tree. action window / playlists, media library tree itself. This would keep those things consistent.

I would fine this to be much faster. Currently (in 11), filename (loc) loses it's folders once you click around a few times in it but I'm sure that will be fixed one way or the other.
Title: Re:trees and panes
Post by: pipsqueak on August 06, 2004, 11:46:33 am
could this be extended to 'quick play' as well as hairstyle?
Title: Re:trees and panes
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2004, 11:47:16 am
I agree that putting a tree in the panes could be nice for some things.

However, it hasn't been a high priority because only a few view scheme types could take advantage of it.

Still, it's something we'd like to do someday.

Thanks again.
Title: Re:trees and panes
Post by: pipsqueak on August 06, 2004, 12:01:31 pm
Trees would be really nice in panes for tagging photos.

Right now my 'persons' list goes crazy, if we could have trees then i could create groups so I could have 'family' - then put all my family members in it, 'friends' all my friends in it, etc - trees in the panes for tagging would be perfect for this
Title: Re:trees and panes
Post by: Matt on August 06, 2004, 01:44:06 pm
could this be extended to 'quick play' as well as hairstyle?

It's all the same system, so the change will show up everywhere.
Title: Re:trees and panes
Post by: Jaguu on August 06, 2004, 02:20:38 pm
Many moons ago I made a suggestion to have an option in a view scheme to decide whether we would like to have this view scheme in theater view or not. This would  give us the great advantage that we could have only selected view schemes displayed in theater view. Right now the system is too rigid as we have a number of view schemes that are there only for organisational purposes and don't need to be displayed in theater view.

This would really allow to have some simple configuration for theater view. Just make a simple option for every view scheme.