INTERACT FORUM
More => Music, Movies, Politics, and Other Cheap Thrills => Topic started by: MrC on January 14, 2013, 03:37:36 pm
-
I don't know much about this stuff, but this seems like it can't be bad:
http://www.anandtech.com/show/6665/intels-quick-sync-coming-soon-to-your-favorite-open-source-transcoding-applications- (http://www.anandtech.com/show/6665/intels-quick-sync-coming-soon-to-your-favorite-open-source-transcoding-applications-)
-
QuickSync is pretty junky in the quality department.
Tech Report did a comparison (which wasn't the best in the rigorous quality department itself either) a while back which showed this. It is quite fast, but it is essentially a black box with no control over quality settings.
Still, for some needs, you don't much care and just want it to be fast. So, generally, I'm with you. Not a bad thing at all.
-
http://techreport.com/review/23324/a-look-at-hardware-video-transcoding-on-the-pc
-
The point that stuck out to me like a sore thumb:
The unfortunate truth is that, right now, hardware-accelerated video transcoding on the PC is a mess.