INTERACT FORUM
More => Old Versions => JRiver Media Center 19 for Mac => Topic started by: jtwrace on January 05, 2014, 03:44:53 pm
-
I've been very curious to know if the new Mac Pro would yield any result with JRiver MC. So I went to the Mac store and downloaded MC onto the pro and ran the Benchmark Tool. Here is the not so special result.
Mac Pro 6-Core 16GB RAM $4,000
-
Here are the actual unit specs:
-
A JRMark of 3800 is not too shabby though, it beats all other Mac JRMarks on this thread:
http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=83470.0 (http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=83470.0)
-
A JRMark of 3800 is not too shabby though compared to all other Mac JRMarks on this thread:
http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=83470.0 (http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=83470.0)
No but this is a $4k Mac. If you compare this to the Mac Mini 2.6 QC it's nearly the same result for a quarter of the price.
Of course this is using JRiver. Obviously there will be programs that will require the Mac Pro. I'm only interested in JRiver though.
-
Well my Hackintosh got this :) It was maybe ~1300, and that's because I needed a fancy graphics card for video editing work. Running 10.9.1
=== Running Benchmarks (please do not interrupt) ===
Running 'Math' benchmark...
Single-threaded integer math... 3.915 seconds
Single-threaded floating point math... 2.396 seconds
Multi-threaded integer math... 1.046 seconds
Multi-threaded mixed math... 0.653 seconds
Score: 2372
Running 'Image' benchmark...
Image creation / destruction... 1.012 seconds
Flood filling... 0.596 seconds
Direct copying... 1.264 seconds
Small renders... 1.165 seconds
Bilinear rendering... 1.144 seconds
Bicubic rendering... 0.543 seconds
Score: 3844
Running 'Database' benchmark...
Create database... 0.327 seconds
Populate database... 1.371 seconds
Save database... 0.142 seconds
Reload database... 0.057 seconds
Search database... 1.010 seconds
Sort database... 0.652 seconds
Group database... 0.727 seconds
Score: 5015
JRMark (version 19.0.100): 3744
-
I was looking at this benchmark with a 2012 2.6 Ghz rMBP, but found the first results are the fastest, and then it seems to provide uneven results with sequential benchmarks, not consistent IMHO.
-
It's normal for the benchmarks to vary a little (10%?), but make sure you're not running something in the background.
-
I did a JRMark on one. It's in the JRMark thread, near the end:
http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=54396.msg597176#msg597176