I understand that if I want to turn right or left, it's my (perceived) choice. If nobody else is in the car, whose choice is it? God's? Maybe. I assume that God guided my ultimate choice of right or left - hence, no accident. I may be saying that someone(thing) may "assist" that choice, but I don't know it.
I don't usually talk about religion much because I'm not religious and it confuses me too much
However, whenever I find myself in conversation with a religious person, I sometimes will ask (as many do) "If there is a God, then why is there so much bad in the world? Why do people kill, etc...". This is always answered with "Because He gave us free-will."
Now, if we, as humans posess "free-will" (yes, that is an ambiguous term, but I'll let people use their common sense on that one... probably not a good idea ), then the whole Eve eating the apple thing holds, and all seems fair enough.
However, you argue that humans don't actually posess free-will at all.. we are "guided" in our ultimate choices of left or right. Where does that leave poor Eve? And doesn't that make life pretty darn pointless?
I dunno... just rambling really. It's all too confusing for me...
Just as the concept of infinity is in actuality beyond our grasp, the faculty of free will existing contemporaneously with an omniscient, omnipotent G-d is utterly incomprehensible. Aristotelian Logic makes the two mutually exclusive.
Now, does that mean this logic is the be-all, end-all, final word on the human mind? Absolutely not. Goedel's Theorem suggests that there exists something beyond the finite system of our experience, that probably somehow "illuminates" the infinitude of the Universe, and ergo explains the man/G-d "relationship." Nobody's discovered it yet, or even formulated an hypothesis that can instruct us on how to speak of it.
That's where the power of metaphor comes in. It has served us well (e.g. in quantum physics), and I think it will likely be an essential tool in this final puzzle.