INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Data organizational question  (Read 1092 times)

modelmaker

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1531
Data organizational question
« on: December 12, 2004, 01:40:53 am »

I'm running out of room on my 200gig HD. I have a 120gig on hand that I'm going to use until I can get a larger drive or go to a raid configuration.

My question: should I continue with the same setup as on my original drive (Artists & Albums/A thru Z) on the next drive or should I split the original drive, say, move S thru Z to the 120gig? I know it doesn't make any difference to MC, altho, when ripping, I would have to keep switching the destination directory if I split the directories. A konundrum.
Logged
Jay.

"Life is what happens when you're making other plans"     John Lennon.

sanderson

  • Member
  • *
  • Posts: 3
Re: Data organizational question
« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2005, 12:46:49 am »

I'm running out of room on my 200gig HD. I have a 120gig on hand that I'm going to use until I can get a larger drive or go to a raid configuration.

My question: should I continue with the same setup as on my original drive (Artists & Albums/A thru Z) on the next drive or should I split the original drive, say, move S thru Z to the 120gig? I know it doesn't make any difference to MC, altho, when ripping, I would have to keep switching the destination directory if I split the directories. A konundrum.

I have a related question.  I'm starting over, having been without MP3 playback for a while.  I have about 100 Gigs of MP3s.  Should I organize my files in artist folders, put them all in the root of the drive or create some other form of file storage organization?  I know MC will organize things nicely any way.  Do you have a prefered style of organizing files on a drive?  What do others familiar with MC do, and why?  I'd love to hear your thoughts.  Thanks!

Logged

hit_ny

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3310
  • nothing more to say...
Re: Data organizational question
« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2005, 04:07:25 am »

Here's how i do it. Spread across 3 partitions of approx 40Gbs on 120Gb drives. Why 3 partitions instead of just 1, i read somewhere that this limits any damage somewhat. 1 partition goes the other 2 are hopefully ok. Of course if h.w problem i'm hosed ( but then i mirror my drives monthly to identical backup drives.)

Root
|
|_Genre -1
|  |______Artist (if more than 3 by same gets its own folder)
|  |______VA's
|
|_Genre-2
|......

this way when i run low on space i juggle the genre folders to partitions that have space (moving them within MC of course so it tracks them)

I started doing it this way since the winamp days.
Logged

GHammer

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1930
  • Stereotypes are a real timesaver!
Re: Data organizational question
« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2005, 05:09:20 am »

I'm running out of room on my 200gig HD. I have a 120gig on hand that I'm going to use until I can get a larger drive or go to a raid configuration.

It's a pain to juggle that way.
If you use XP you can make the existing disk a Dynamic disk. Make the new disc a dynamic disk. Now create a spanned volume. Add as many physical disks as you like.

Drawbacks?
If you lose a single physical disk you lose all info.
You can't make the boot disk a part of the spanned volume.

Pluses?
You get unlimited room (kind of) in a single drive so yuo don't need to split things and juggle room.

The "if I lose a single drive I lose all info" scares some people. But, if you use a single drive now, isn't it the same? Backup, backup, backup!
Logged

Sam

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 300
Re: Data organizational question
« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2005, 11:57:36 am »

I know a lot of people like to organize music files into neat artist/album folders, but I never really understood the point of that since MC allows you to find and access any files you want using the tags.

I put my files somewhat randomly into 4.5GB folders.  I then back up the folders to DVDs.  Any given artist may be spread across a dozen different folders, but I don't see a problem with that.

The only possible drawback with this approach that I've noticed is that MC uses logical folders to determine if multi-artist albums are part of the same album.  It's not a problem for me because I don't really play albums (I play playlists of individual songs), but I suppose that one could easily make sure that songs of multi-artist albums are all placed in the same folder.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up