INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Pono Player -Worth the Money?  (Read 2883 times)

styxx10

  • Junior Woodchuck
  • **
  • Posts: 93
Pono Player -Worth the Money?
« on: April 07, 2015, 11:31:33 pm »

Hi,
Interested to hear what people think of their Pono Players, is the quality and difference worth the extra dollars?.
Opinions as to the ease of use, quality etc appreciated.
Logged

MikeEvangelist

  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 16
Re: Pono Player -Worth the Money?
« Reply #1 on: April 08, 2015, 08:22:57 am »

I posted this little review back in January, via Twitter (hence the short sentences) -


The @pono player is a high quality player for all your audio files. Hooked up to your stereo or with good headphones, it sounds great.

The interface of the @pono player is rudimentary and jumpy, but it gets the job done. The desktop software, I find non-intuitive and frustrating.

Due to its excellent DAC and output section, lossless rips from CDs sound fantastic on the @pono player. Even lower bitrate files sing

I can -maybe- tell the difference between CD-quality and 24bit/96KHz on the @pono, on very good headphones, but it’s extremely minor.

Don’t waste your money on 192KHz versions for the @pono player; they won’t sound any different than 96KHz or 88KHz versions.

The pricing on the @pono store (and other hi-rez stores) is completely nuts. Just buy the CD and rip it to lossless format.

I don't mind the odd shape. But you can’t really put the @pono in a pocket without constantly pushing the buttons unintentionally.

For people with large collections, it's rather inconvenient that the @pono software doesn’t manage the internal memory and SD card in a unified way. It's all manual. (I realize this may be due to limitations of how the Pono handles multiple removable volumes, but there are ways to deal with this.)

I bought the @pono as a high quality player/decoder for my lossless music collection. It delivers that, so I’m happy.

The rest of the @pono 'hi-rez is better' pitch is largely marketing hype.

Happily, you don’t need the @pono overpriced-but-sound-the-same, hi-rez files to get fabulous sound. Get 16-bit/44KHz and be happy.
Logged

shieber

  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 42
Re: Pono Player -Worth the Money?
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2015, 09:41:33 am »

I don't think you will find anything at even twice the price that sounds as good. Ayre did a terrific job with the audio circuitry.
Logged

channel-1

  • Regular Member
  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 32
Re: Pono Player -Worth the Money?
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2015, 09:02:58 pm »

I don't think you will find anything at even twice the price that sounds as good. Ayre did a terrific job with the audio circuitry.
+1

Terrific piece of gear for the price.  For example, take a look at Tyll Hertsens review over at Inner Fidelity.  He gives it a thorough work-out in his evaluation.

Also it plays every format PCM and DSD that I have in my collection... and all resolutions, at least up to 192 KHz.  I also take appreciate the  external micro-SD card slot.  No nice-to-have extra features like wi-fi or bluetooth, however. Also no built in equalization.

I primarily use it in balanced operation with my Sennheiser HD 650s, but also makes my stereo sound much better compared to feeding it from my computer + Dragonfly USB DAC. 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up