INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Interpreting the EQ presets  (Read 1458 times)

PaulSinnema

  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 393
  • You don't know what you're missing until its gone
Interpreting the EQ presets
« on: April 30, 2007, 04:08:03 pm »

Hi,

I'm trying to implement the EQ presets from Registry. I've tried to interpret the values in the Registry. I've already found some links in the Forum about this but maybe someone can shed some light on the things I found.

When I select 'Flat' from the presets I find 'OOOOOOOOOOO' (11 O's (not 0 (zero)). I deduct from this that 'O' stands for value 0. When I set a slider to the Top I get a '0' (this time it is the zero). When I set a slider to bottom I get a 'n'. Since the EQBand asks for values from 100 to -100 I deduct that '0' = 100 'O' = 0 and 'n' = -100. So far so good. Writing down the values for the letters tells me there is no escaping rounding for the values. The Table below should reflect what I'm saying does everyone agree? If this is what it is supposed to be than I realy don't understand the implementation. In any case it's not a KISS approach but maybe there is a good explanation for this

Paul.

AsciiCharDevPresetRounded
48031100100
4913096.7741935597
5022993.548387194
5132890.3225806590
5242787.0967741987
5352683.8709677484
5462580.6451612981
5572477.4193548477
5682374.1935483974
5792270.9677419471
58:2167.7419354868
59"2064.5161290365
60<1961.2903225861
61=1858.0645161358
62>1754.8387096855
63?1651.6129032352
64@1548.3870967748
65A1445.1612903245
66B1341.9354838742
67C1238.7096774239
68D1135.4838709735
69E1032.2580645232
70F929.0322580629
71G825.8064516126
72H722.5806451623
73I619.3548387119
74J516.1290322616
75K412.9032258113
76L39.67741935510
77M26.4516129036
78N13.2258064523
79O000
80P-1-3.225806452-3
81Q-2-6.451612903-6
82R-3-9.677419355-10
83S-4-12.90322581-13
84T-5-16.12903226-16
85U-6-19.35483871-19
86V-7-22.58064516-23
87W-8-25.80645161-26
88X-9-29.03225806-29
89Y-10-32.25806452-32
90Z-11-35.48387097-35
91[-12-38.70967742-39
92\-13-41.93548387-42
93]-14-45.16129032-45
94^-15-48.38709677-48
95_-16-51.61290323-52
96`-17-54.83870968-55
97a-18-58.06451613-58
98b-19-61.29032258-61
99c-20-64.51612903-65
100d-21-67.74193548-68
101e-22-70.96774194-71
102f-23-74.19354839-74
103g-24-77.41935484-77
104h-25-80.64516129-81
105i-26-83.87096774-84
106j-27-87.09677419-87
107k-28-90.32258065-90
108l-29-93.5483871-94
109m-30-96.77419355-97
110n-31-100-100
Logged

scthom

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 621
Re: Interpreting the EQ presets
« Reply #1 on: April 30, 2007, 07:47:50 pm »

That's exactly correct.
Logged

PaulSinnema

  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 393
  • You don't know what you're missing until its gone
Re: Interpreting the EQ presets
« Reply #2 on: May 01, 2007, 01:58:46 am »

Hi Scot,

Yep, feared as much. Why didn't they just have the EQBand functions accept the values 31 to  -31 (or even better have the Presets at 100 to -100). That would have uncomplicated things a lot. Ok, I know what to now.

Paul.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up