But I tried it once and dropped it quickly because I was confused. I retried two years later and "got it".
...
I wonder how many people had the same reaction I had upon beholding the beast ...
Very similar experience. My first interaction with MC was extremely negative. I didn't understand the layout, why it was Importing my files the way it was, how to configure it, etc. I immediately uninstalled it and did not give it a second look for several years.
As I upgraded my audio system, and the quality of my Library, I began looking for better playback options. JRiver is highly regarded in the Audiophile community, so I gave it another shot. I spent some time configuring Views, got to know the interface a bit, and I had a somewhat better experience. However, I had also installed MC because I wanted an all-in-one media playback system, and trying to set up DLNA was nearly impossible. I received very little help from the Media Network forum, and I never got it right. I left it installed, but I didn't really use it for its full capabilities for another 2-years. Probably only because I had the time due to certain life circumstances, did I spend the time with MC19 to really understand the software and what it could do. DLNA still does not do everything I would like it to do though, and there is still limited to no support for it.
The power and customization of JRiver is undeniable. The average consumer wants something that "just works" straight out of the box though. How many average consumers use AutoCad or even Photoshop? They want something to quickly take out red eye and maybe resize or crop. I think the key is finding a balance with ease of use and a suitable user-interface (ie eye candy) that "just works" for 95% of the customers, but then also has the functionality to be easily configured for that 5% power user audience.