INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: why not a larger buffer?  (Read 1624 times)

forresto

  • Regular Member
  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • nothing more to say...
why not a larger buffer?
« on: March 10, 2003, 08:04:32 pm »

I would like to commit 20mb of ram to the buffer, about 20 minutes of -q 4 oggs, so that the HD does not need to be accessed all the time.

As of now, the maximum buffer size is 5 seconds.

In the future, can we set the buffer to be much larger?

PS great product
Logged

michel

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 619
Re: why not a larger buffer?
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2003, 10:32:28 pm »

I second that. Sometimes I have three simultaneous "playing now" (media server and two clients) so I would like reduce HD head moves using a little bit larger buffer.
Logged

Zoner

  • Regular Member
  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 198
  • nothing more to say...
Re: why not a larger buffer?
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2003, 10:32:50 pm »

Also, a smarter buffer.  I haven't played around much with this in MC9, but in most programs the buffer is "dumb" in that if you have a 20-second buffer, then the song starts playing 20 seconds after you hit play.  This is of course ridiculous - the song should start (and stop) instantly, and the buffer should fill in the background to a limit of X seconds.
Logged

KingSparta

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 20063
Re: why not a larger buffer?
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2003, 03:06:32 am »

>> so that the HD does not need to be accessed
>> all the time.
this is not a good reason, and really is no strain on the HD

a better reason is to maybe overcome some problems some systems may have from time to time.

a 20 meg buffer is a bit overboard


Logged
Retired Military, Airborne, Air Assault, And Flight Wings.
Model Trains, Internet, Ham Radio, Music
https://MyAAGrapevines.com
https://centercitybbs.com
Fayetteville, NC, USA

nila

  • Guest
Re: why not a larger buffer?
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2003, 04:00:38 am »

Not if you have 1Gig of DDR Ram like me King :)

My system is always busy with a LOT going on and frequent hard drive reads and writes. I dont mind commiting this much to keeping my soul calm from my lovely music! :)
Logged

forresto

  • Regular Member
  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • nothing more to say...
Re: why not a larger buffer?
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2003, 05:21:56 am »

Less HD access is a good reason if you want to consume less battery juice.

And I second the smart buffer comment.
Logged

forresto

  • Regular Member
  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 10
  • nothing more to say...
Re: why not a larger buffer?
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2003, 07:44:08 am »

Quote
Less HD access is a good reason if you want to consume less battery juice.


Like an ipod...
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up