Matt, thank you very much for your fast replay. You probably are not aware that there is a standard for WAV tags, although it is more commonly used in the broadcast environment.
Maybe, you want to have a look here :
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Broadcast_Wave_FormatSome of your competitors have started to read and write these tags within the last months, as it greatly improves the file handling building libraries.
To keep your product competitive, I suggest you download a trial version of dbpoweramp and rip a CD as WAV. To check the compatibility of the tags, use another program to check them, for example AudioShell.
We are building Audio Media Computers for the most exigent clients regarding audio quality. Our products are monitored with the most sophisticated equipment. Please understand that they do not accept any kind of compression.
I do not really want to discuss further the differences of lossless audio compressions. But I really would like to use MC, it is a wonderful product.
Instead, I give you another example of sound alteration that cannot be. Do you know that most of our clients are rejecting MC using the ASIO plugin for playout with the hardware we use (Lynx AES16). The sound is simply inferior to another media product that uses another plugin. ASIO is bittransparent, there can't be a differnce but there is on, a huge one. And did you know that your WASAPI is simply gorgeous and that there is a huge difference to your ASIO plugin. WASAPI is bittransparent as well there can't be any differences, or can there be... give yourself a try.
However, there should not be the discussion what is good or better. Please give the concerned music lovers the possibility to use WAV tags. I do not want to be forced to use other media products than yours, JR simply rocks.