All food for thought ...
And I totally agree ... there's absolutely positively nothing optimal about my setup, but ... ya works with what ya gots. I had to break all sorts of rules to get the system working, and I might add, working well in my environment. Looks can be deceiving. Thing is, you ain't seen the half of it.
<AUDIO PURISTS - LEAVE THE ROOM NOW!>
- The actual "room" is an 8x8 cube - as bad as it gets for standing waves. The rear wall is all thickly insulated which helps reduce the bounce. The room behind is open arched and expands the stage significantly, adding another 1100 some odd square feet for the sound to develop. That stage would basically suck without some serious EQ courtesy of a 31 band eq AND a McIntosh passive eq to take care of the big lumps. From there it's been voiced with pro grade equipment.
- The speakers and chair are more or less optimally placed for a holographic system, allowing for equidistant adjustments for the room's volume. Laugh all you want, but Bob Carver had something going with that - even considering the ridiculously small window of perfection it creates. I also have a Hughes AK100 which has a wider window and is more adjustable, but falls flat IMHO on soundstage and instrument placement compared to the Carver. It's the grandaddy of SR3 that I kick in for the old stuff that doesn't have a whole lot of stage working for it in the first place. Add to that dbx expansion, bass synth and other assorted what nots that make most audiophiles cring. Just having 46 interconnects can be enough to induce vomiting with those whose concept of music is five boxes including a turntable. The big MC16s on the front can make the room hover, yet I still hear nice detail on the bottom. Addressing the comments on being too close to the cabinet - they're isolinear with minimal toe and stand proud of the cabinet face so there's no notable obstruction that the Carver doesn't address. Add to that quadraphonic - no - make that sexophonic as I have two sets of speakers running in out of phase balanced pairs - one overhead at the back of the "listening area" and another at the far back of the "room" courtesy of a Wurlitzer quad adapter, which makes for some amazing depth of field. Not to mention that the two rear speaker sets are Bose 201s which do the Bose thing with reflections and all ... horrors! By now you may get the impression that my system isn't ... uh ... ordinary.
Or even in good taste, but hey, I had fun building it, like the results, and I've managed to blow quite a few pairs of socks off those who've had a listen ... who could ask for more?
Interestingly enough, with all that happening via hardware, I use NONE of the MC addons for post processing, or any of the "environments" available with the sound card on the HTPC. Tried em, didn't like em. Go figure.
Could it be better? Of course it could! The search for the elusive "brown note" continues ... and that's the fun part.
Dear OP,
Sorry about the lengthy detour ... I'll go away now ...