I would be more than happy to have a bit-perfect playback up to 96 kHz. In fact I don't believe higher samples - like 192 kHz (or even 96 kHz) - brings an "improvement" the sound quality. Word length yes (at least in theory).
It is very simple, you can’t have frequencies above ½ fs (Shannon/Nyquist) so the higher the sample rate, the higher the frequencies you can reproduce.
As even acoustic instruments (cymbal is a well known example, 40 % above 20k) have energy above 20 k, a higher sample rate is better.
Whether you hear it is a different matter.
Bit depth increases the dynamic range. As 0 dBFS is by design the loudest the DAC can play, it is basically about resolving tiny details. 24 does this better than 16.
If you really crank up the volume you can make it audible but you do have to play fff IMHO
Having both redbook and various Hires recordings, imho the quality of the recording is far more important than redbook (16/44) or Hires.
YMMV
A nice one: try the bit tester in the DSP studio
I thought when using DirectSound and/or WASAPI I was "bypassing" the ASIO interface. When using DirectSound doesn't the audio signal goes through the KMixer? What about bit-perfect playback, say of a 24-bit, 96 kHz file? Doesn't KMixer messes with it?
This is about audio drivers, you use DS or WASAPI or ASIO. By design using one means not using the others.
Kmixer=XP but Win7 has a mixer too. It always converts to 32 float and back to the bit depth supported by your audio device and applies dither in the process.
By design using DS=mixer=not bit perfect.
I do hear a subtle difference between DS and WASAPI. WASAPI is slightly more transparent.
Again YMMV
An asset of WASAPI is automatic sample rate switching (ASIO does it too). DS resamples all to the rate set in the audio panel
Nice piece of information (as usual). I promise to read it carefully, but on a quick "scan" of that page I notice the following sentence: "Centrance, manufacturer of adaptive mode solutions". That means the Dangerous Source (XMOS USB Receiver) is no asynchronous?
Thanks
At the time I wrote this, Centrance supplied USB receivers as OEM to Ayre, Wavelength, Benchmark, etc.
They stick to long to the adaptive mode solution and where wiped of this market by e.g. XMOS.
XMOS is as far as I know async.
A simple one it to check it yourself; try Thesycon USB Descriptor Dumper
I am aware Linux is quite a capable and suitable system or media playback, but my "problem" is that I feel like a "fish out of the water" in this Linux World.
Me too, gave up on Linux.
Besides, the players I used at that time gave me the Win3 feeling interface wise.
Success