Thank you very much for your reply. I did search the Forum before posting and had even read the linked post.
I am also aware of the (tedious) workarounds and that not all HDCDs sound better. If they were mastered by experienced engineers (like say Bob Ludwig) who know what they are doing and care, they can sound better.
I guess everyone has a different experience when it comes to HDCD tracks but (except for a couple songs from compilations) the majority of my HDCD tracks come from fully mastered HDCD Discs that were made intentionally so.
As stated I am a big fan of MC but for an audiophile product I would think that the developer does care about every improvement that can be gained (and in the past MC has done so constantly).
There may be certain audiophile technologies (like for example SACD) that can't be implemented (yet) because of hardware and/or license impossibilities but in the case of HDCD decoding this does not seem to be the case.
So despite the limits and sometimes bigger or smaller benefits the bottom line is that HDCD can and does benefit the quality of recordings, and as such would have a place in an audiophile product such as MC. Especially since it neither seems difficult or time intensive to implement as some of the excellent stuff already integrated in MC.
Even more so since audiophile and non-audiophile equipment from NAD, Naim, Vincent, Marantz, oppo, some of the Denon even Media Player all support the decoding of HDCDs; why do we have to use tedious workarounds with the best audiophile software player on the market?