INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Dsd to 176 or 88.2  (Read 1629 times)

terrys999

  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 31
Dsd to 176 or 88.2
« on: May 05, 2017, 03:50:45 pm »

Could anyone explain
Which is better when converting dsd to pcm flac.
176 or 88.2?

Would 176 cause problems?
Logged

TheShoe

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 785
Re: Dsd to 176 or 88.2
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2017, 05:39:53 pm »

don't know which is better but for me by default jriver transcodes mine to 192

i leave it alone and it sounds perfect to my ears


Logged
TV: LG OLED C1 83"
3D: LG OLED C6 65" (two) - madVR MVC->SBS
3D: Valve Index (using Media Center+MadVR) + Virtual Home Theater (Steam)
HTPC: Core i7, Win11, nVidia 3090RTX
Storage: 500TB Snapraid via SMB to Ubuntu 18 LTS server
Audio: exaSound e68 Multichannel USB DAC, Sonus Faber Speakers, REL Subx2
Video: HDMI 2.1/4K@120Hz, JRVR (2D), MadVR (3D), 7.1 Channel Audio into AMPs: Conrad Johnson 2/5 Channel Amps, Marantz av8805A PreAmp
Cables: Shotgun Interconnects, AudioQuest Cinnamon 48GB HDMI cables

dtc

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3015
Re: Dsd to 176 or 88.2
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2017, 06:05:12 pm »

I believe MC converts DSD to PCM at 1/8 the original sample rate. So, 1x DSD (2.8 MHz) goes to 352 KHz PCM. That is simply a manifestation of the software decoder they use, not a statement about sound quality. If you want something below that, you need to downsample the result.

If you just go by the number of bits, 2.822 MHz/24 gives you 118 KHz/ 24 bit PCM - which is between 88 and 176. When SACDs were "popular" the record companies would often put out an 88 KHz/24 bit version and many hi rez downloads are still at 88 KHz because they came for SACDs. That said, playback of 176 KHz was not very common in those days.

I would suggest trying some and listening to the result. I doubt you can hear the difference, but disk space is cheap these days so 176 KHz may be a good option.

Also, check out the discussion of low pass filter options here

http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php/topic,110496.0.html
Logged

Fitzcaraldo215

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 217
Re: Dsd to 176 or 88.2
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2017, 06:50:20 pm »

There is no right answer, assuming your DAC could do either.  So, if you are looking to us to tell you, you would be foolish to do so. 

I personally prefer to use 176k, but there was a period of time when 88k "sounded better" I thought. The point is, the difference is at best small to non-existent, and ultimately it us up to you, not anyone else.  Listen and decide.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up