More > JRiver Media Center 23 for Linux
Re: JRiver Media Center 23.0.78 for Debian Jessie (amd64, i386 and arm)
UdoS:
--- Quote from: bob on October 09, 2017, 08:53:21 am ---Since that code hasn't changed between 22 and 23 there still is likely something different between in the settings between your MC22 and MC23.
I'd check the format setting under Tools->Options->Audio->Device Settings
and also the DSP studio settings.
--- End quote ---
Hi Bob,
thanks for the reply.
I checked the configurations, but I couldn't find an difference. So, I swapped the "User Settings.ini" and the "Machine Settings.ini", but the problem still stays with the 23.xx version. The 22.xx version is running the headset also with the 23. ini files applied.
However, if you run the same source code, the must be a difference in how you pass the data to alsa. Both version running at the same machine, same configuration.
I run both versions simultaneously on speaker, when I connect to the headphone, MC22 switched over to bt-headphone, MC23 continued to use the speaker.
bob:
--- Quote from: UdoS on October 10, 2017, 06:27:50 am ---Hi Bob,
thanks for the reply.
I checked the configurations, but I couldn't find an difference. So, I swapped the "User Settings.ini" and the "Machine Settings.ini", but the problem still stays with the 23.xx version. The 22.xx version is running the headset also with the 23. ini files applied.
However, if you run the same source code, the must be a difference in how you pass the data to alsa. Both version running at the same machine, same configuration.
I run both versions simultaneously on speaker, when I connect to the headphone, MC22 switched over to bt-headphone, MC23 continued to use the speaker.
--- End quote ---
Interesting.
They were both compiled on wheezy as well.
Are you running with the thread priorities enabled??
bob:
--- Quote from: Ekpen on October 09, 2017, 12:43:31 pm ---Yes, I already figured these differences. What I did not know is the networking stack used by Windows, and the Linux cURL.
Thanks for the Network 101 education <grin>.
The main reason I started with Linux, was because MC was only available in 32 bit, then suddenly JR slapped us with a much anticipated 64 bit. No need shutting down the Windows server any longer.
With the Windows and Linux server running now, I am learning a lot between the two operating systems.
btw..
I have a desktop server that I had used for Windows 7 in the past. It is a special case Origen ST 21 with built-in 1080P screen. The build it 95% complete, except I need more Hard Drives, and the latest Nvidia GPU. It has 24 gig of memory.
I am planning to install Fedora 64 bit? Just to give me another exposure to a different distro.
Do you agree with using Fedora, or just stay with Ubuntu?. If Fedora, is it going to be same Jessie AMD64?
Thanks.
George
--- End quote ---
I think Fedora would work OK but it's always going to be easier to stick with a debian or debian derived system.
Awesome Donkey:
Fedora should be fine, but it requires more "hands on" setting up, versus Debian and Ubuntu.
IMO, the easiest distros to get MC working on the quickest is Ubuntu and Mint.
UdoS:
--- Quote from: bob on October 10, 2017, 10:25:03 am ---Interesting.
They were both compiled on wheezy as well.
Are you running with the thread priorities enabled??
--- End quote ---
I don't know. Where can I find this option? since I don't know it, probably not.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version