some background about DSD
cited from:
https://benchmarkmedia.com/blogs/application_notes/41262017-audio-myth-dsd-provides-a-direct-stream-from-a-d-to-d-a__________________________
....For this reason, DSD is almost exactly equivalent to a 20-bit 96 kHz PCM system. Notice that I said "20-bit" and not "24-bit".
The Near-Death of the 1-bit System
...In the process of aggressively promoting the failing SACD format, many questionable claims were made. Most claims tried to leverage the appeal of the apparent simplicity of the 1-bit system. Other claims highlighted the bandwidth of the 2.8 MHz sampling system while ignoring the fact that a 50 kHz lowpass filter was required at the output of the D/A converter. These claims produced a loyal DSD following. Many SACD releases were excellent recordings, but their quality has nothing to do with any virtues of the DSD format.
The most common production signal paths for creating a DSD release are as follows:
24-bit PCM A/D > PCM Workstation > 24-bit PCM > 1-bit Noise Shaper > DSD
1-bit DSD A/D > 1-bit DSD D/A > Analog Console > 1-bit A/D >DSD
Analog Tape > Analog Mixing > Analog Master > 1-bit A/D > DSD
1-bit DSD A/D > DSD to DXD Conversion > DXD PCM Mixing > 1-bit Noise Shaper > DSD
...If the audio exists in a multibit format, the quality will not be improved by noise-shaping down to 1-bit. This multibit to 1-bit conversion should be avoided when possible.
In virtually all cases, DSD adds significant processing to the music production chain. DSD absolutely fails to deliver a "direct" path between the A/D and the D/A. Any such claims are marketing spin. DSD offers no advantages over a conventional 24-bit 96 kHz system, and it fails to leverage the massively parallel architecture of modern converters.
DSD cannot match the measured performance of a conventional 24-bit 96 kHz system.
________________________________________
The last sentence is the key why if available go PCM.