INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Reasons to re-analyse audio?  (Read 579 times)

d_pert

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • I love music and great audio!
Reasons to re-analyse audio?
« on: June 28, 2019, 06:26:03 am »

Aside from HDCD-related considerations:

Would there ever be any reason to re-analyse one's entire library, if it was last (re-)analysed following the release of v.19 (and the introduction, with that version, of R128)?

In other words, have there been any refinements to the analysis function which might yield improved measurements, or would any tags produced today end up being identical to the tags produced, say, as far back as v.19?

Thanks.
Logged
Derek Pert
(Windows 11 Pro x64 / 32GB RAM)

JimH

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 71529
  • Where did I put my teeth?
Re: Reasons to re-analyse audio?
« Reply #1 on: June 28, 2019, 06:40:49 am »

I don't believe so.  I think R128 was the last change.  Until HDCD.
Logged

d_pert

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 392
  • I love music and great audio!
Re: Reasons to re-analyse audio?
« Reply #2 on: June 28, 2019, 06:48:36 am »

Cool, thanks.

BTW -- I'm watching the Analyze Audio window working through approx. 65,000 files right now, three at a time, following the .70 HDCD introduction. I'm sure I haven't analyzed any of them since v.19: none of the figures in any of the ReplayGain and/or R128 related fields are changing following re-analysis -- only the HDCD column, from -1 to 0 or 1 (three 1s so far!).

Logged
Derek Pert
(Windows 11 Pro x64 / 32GB RAM)
Pages: [1]   Go Up