INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Performance improvement with 29.0.56  (Read 960 times)

HaWi

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 905
Performance improvement with 29.0.56
« on: June 01, 2022, 09:17:19 am »

Performance on my iMac went way up from 2837 to 3590. Thanks Bob.
Logged
rPi5/8GB, Debian 12 Bookworm on SSD | JRMark (32.0.36 64 bit): 2699
MacBookPro (2013), 2.6 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7, MacOS 11.7.17 | JRMark (32.0.38 64 bit): 3764
Mac Studio M2 Max, 64GB, 1TB SSD, macOS Sonoma 14.4.1 | JRMark (32.0.38 64 bit): 9235
Docker Container (shiomax) DS1819+ | JRMark (32.0.36 64 bit): 1430
JRemote 3.43
MO 4Media 1.5.7 | Marantz SR7007 (RSL 5.1) HDMI to MacBookPro

blgentry

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 8009
Re: Performance improvement with 29.0.56
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2022, 01:46:54 pm »

Interesting.  You got a performance increase of roughly 25%.  I just ran these two on my system:

JRMark (version 29.0.38 64 bit): 6276
JRMark (version 29.0.56 64 bit): 6966

That's a difference of about 10%. 

MC always seems very snappy on this system, but then again so does almost everything else.  Scrolling through album covers is still a little jumpy/chunky, but MC has been that way since I started using it with MC20.

Brian.
Logged

HaWi

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 905
Re: Performance improvement with 29.0.56
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2022, 02:44:15 pm »

I believe there was a change in .50 that created a drop in performance for non-M1 Macs that was removed in .56. So for me it's just back to normal, however, since I reported the drop in .50, I also wanted to let Bob know that the reversal in .56 worked.
Logged
rPi5/8GB, Debian 12 Bookworm on SSD | JRMark (32.0.36 64 bit): 2699
MacBookPro (2013), 2.6 GHz Quad-Core Intel Core i7, MacOS 11.7.17 | JRMark (32.0.38 64 bit): 3764
Mac Studio M2 Max, 64GB, 1TB SSD, macOS Sonoma 14.4.1 | JRMark (32.0.38 64 bit): 9235
Docker Container (shiomax) DS1819+ | JRMark (32.0.36 64 bit): 1430
JRemote 3.43
MO 4Media 1.5.7 | Marantz SR7007 (RSL 5.1) HDMI to MacBookPro

blgentry

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 8009
Re: Performance improvement with 29.0.56
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2022, 02:47:21 pm »

Ah ha, so it was a version 50 issue.  Since I tested from an earlier version it makes sense that I only saw a 10% change.  I should have just asked which version you had come from I guess.  :)

Thanks for the clarification.
Brian.
Logged

bob

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 13488
Re: Performance improvement with 29.0.56
« Reply #4 on: June 02, 2022, 08:54:19 am »

Also it doesn't seem to make as much of a difference on Intel as it does on the M1 Macs.
Logged

EnglishTiger

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 956
Re: Performance improvement with 29.0.56
« Reply #5 on: June 02, 2022, 10:22:30 am »

Also it doesn't seem to make as much of a difference on Intel as it does on the M1 Macs.

A couple of "Daft" Questions about the M1 MAC Mini:
1) Why when you tell it to download and install a new version of Monterey does the daft thing do a check for Available Updates on the completion of downloading, given that the version it ends up telling you is now available is the one you told it to download and install  ;D
2) For a PC that runs pretty efficiently it sure takes it's time over Preparing and Installing an OS Update. The last time I saw an OS update take anywhere near that long  was back in the days when the MS Operating Systems and Updates were issued on floppy disks  ;D
Logged
Win NUC - VENOEN 11Th NUC Mini PC Core i7 1165G7,Dual HDMI 2.0+Mini DP,Windows 11 Mini Desktop Computer,Thunderbolt 4.0,1 Lan, USB-C,Wifi,Bluetooth 5.0,32GB RAM Toshiba MQ04ABF100 ‎500Gb 5400 RPM ‎eSATA HD, Gigabyte GP-GSM2NE3512GNTD 1Tb NVMe SSD, Samsung 870 QVO 8 TB SATA 2.5 Inch SSD (MZ-77Q8T0) in Sabrent Ultra Slim USB 3.0 to 2.5-Inch SATA External Aluminium Hard Drive Enclosure (EC-UK30)

Apple 2020 Mac mini M1 Chip (8GB RAM, 512GB SSD)
Sabrent Thunderbolt 3 to Dual NVMe M.2 SSD Tool-Free Enclosure with Sabrent 2TB Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 2280 High Performance SSD + Crucial P3 Plus 4TB M.2 PCIe

ET Skins & TrackInfo Plugins - https://englishtiger.uk/index.html

bob

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 13488
Re: Performance improvement with 29.0.56
« Reply #6 on: June 02, 2022, 02:31:38 pm »

A couple of "Daft" Questions about the M1 MAC Mini:
1) Why when you tell it to download and install a new version of Monterey does the daft thing do a check for Available Updates on the completion of downloading, given that the version it ends up telling you is now available is the one you told it to download and install  ;D
The only thing I can think of is that sometimes major updates enable new minor updates to be seen, just as an example, a supplementary driver for iDevice access.
Quote

2) For a PC that runs pretty efficiently it sure takes it's time over Preparing and Installing an OS Update. The last time I saw an OS update take anywhere near that long  was back in the days when the MS Operating Systems and Updates were issued on floppy disks  ;D
Yeah, the process seems pretty involved.
Usually downloads a disk image, reboots to that disk image, partially installs from that disk image, reboots again to finish installing, reboot one more time into the OS.
I think at least some of that has to do with the way the security has evolved on MacOS, it's way more complex than it was a few years ago.
Logged

blgentry

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 8009
Re: Performance improvement with 29.0.56
« Reply #7 on: June 03, 2022, 06:58:30 pm »

Regarding MacOS updates:  I've found updates to MacOS to be the smoothest, easiest, most reliable of any OS I've ever used.  This is from someone who has run Linux, Windows, and Mac as a desktop OS.  I would be rather surprised if your experience with Windows or Linux, doing OS upgrades, was better than that with MacOS. 

Have you had a better upgrade experience in another environment?

The M1 chip is a huge step forward, in performance, as well as power consumption.  But it doesn't make upgrades a lot different.  Much of the upgrade process is bound by other things that are outside of the chip that runs the computer.

Brian.

Logged

bob

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 13488
Re: Performance improvement with 29.0.56
« Reply #8 on: June 03, 2022, 09:17:59 pm »

Regarding MacOS updates:  I've found updates to MacOS to be the smoothest, easiest, most reliable of any OS I've ever used.  This is from someone who has run Linux, Windows, and Mac as a desktop OS.  I would be rather surprised if your experience with Windows or Linux, doing OS upgrades, was better than that with MacOS. 

Have you had a better upgrade experience in another environment?

The M1 chip is a huge step forward, in performance, as well as power consumption.  But it doesn't make upgrades a lot different.  Much of the upgrade process is bound by other things that are outside of the chip that runs the computer.

Brian.
Just in case you are wondering, I'm not complaining.

Though I use Windows, MacOS and linux, MacOS is my desktop go to.
My server runs on linux of course and when I need something that won't run anywhere else, I grab my partners windows touchscreen laptop.

The M1 is certainly an interesting twist. I really don't think it's as fast as my i9 dev box for compiling but it's fast enough to not be annoying. I assume things will only get better.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up