Bob,
Whatever the source quality, you'll lose some of it with MP3 encoding ... even from an MP3. That's not to say that it's no good. The general rule of thumb is that 128 and above is "CD quality" but in my experience, that all depends on the music. Molly Hatchett and ZZ Top would most likely be fine at 128. Rachmanninoff (sp?) Beethoven and Schubert leave something to be desired at 320. VBR is a good compromise because the difference in these tracks are the quiet parts. ZZ Top has very few where Schubert has a lot. WAV files are lossless in that they preserve exactly the source quality. APE is also an exremely good choice as it's lossless and uses about half the space of a WAV. A 128 K MP3 uses about a tenth. So it's a balancing act with quality vs. disk space. I have 4 hard drives totaling about 250 GB and three are full of mostly wav's and ape's. King Sparta's song library and his storage space make that seem small.
The bottom line is that, even if you rip Rhapsody's burns to wav, if it was 128 k to start with, it will still be the same quality.
Let me know what they say. I can't imagine that the burns would be higher quality than the streams and Zevele (Hi, Z.) is quite correct about the streaming quality.
And if I'm not mistaken, the $5 / month service price is only for the first month. After that, it's $9.95. It's still worth it in my opinion. And the burn charge does need to be never over $0.49 per track. It would make more sense to use the length of the song but being as I like long songs, I'll not complain.
Zevele,
It still comes down to needing a way to test the quality irrespective of the file type. I suspect that some CD's are not above 96k quality. And that's being kind. I've heard some very crappy quality CD's straight out of the shrink wrap.
Sheesh!!! Music Industry ... what are you going to do?!?
(That's supposed to be a uniquely American manner of exclamation but I don't think it came out right)
CVIII