INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: MC11 Feature request for split views  (Read 3474 times)

Dutch Peter

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 618
  • Carpe Diem
MC11 Feature request for split views
« on: April 06, 2005, 01:21:59 am »

When using multiple views, these are not saved when closing MC.
The startup options are referring to the era only one view was possible.
I would prefer an option that says: "start views as in previous sessiosn".

Peter
Logged
Stupid questions do not exist, only stupid answers.

Lexi

  • Regular Member
  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 13
  • Change this by choosing profile
MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #1 on: April 06, 2005, 04:38:07 am »

Hello,

Like Peter said, I would also love an option kike: "start views as in previous sessiosn".
Or just an Option to save, an startingview for each splitview.
An Example
I would like to start my Media Center with "Playing Now" for the upper view and "Libraby Browswer" for teh bottom one.

Hope you know what I mean.

thx
Lexi
Logged

Deivit

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1215
  • I find your interest interesting...
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #2 on: April 06, 2005, 07:25:49 am »

My vote here too. I normally want to use "Playing Now" up and "Library Browser" down, and have to arrange the views manually every time I start MC.

Thank you.
Logged

Dutch Peter

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 618
  • Carpe Diem
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #3 on: April 06, 2005, 11:01:38 am »

Thnx guys for your support.
Would you agree that every split view should have it's own search option?
That would mean that I can search in my library without filtering the upper view: being Playing Now or maybe a playlist.
Now it is impossible to drag the found song (in view 2) to the correct spot in Playing Now (view 1).

Peter
Logged
Stupid questions do not exist, only stupid answers.

JoshuaHorowitz

  • Regular Member
  • Junior Woodchuck
  • **
  • Posts: 56
  • nothing more to say... other than that MC rocks!
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #4 on: April 06, 2005, 10:27:25 pm »

Are there shortcut keys for choosing the number of views? If not I'd like to add that as a feature request.
Logged

Dutch Peter

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 618
  • Carpe Diem
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #5 on: April 07, 2005, 12:16:45 am »

No shortcut keys available.
Logged
Stupid questions do not exist, only stupid answers.

CDvd

  • Regular Member
  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #6 on: April 07, 2005, 04:59:24 am »

Would you agree that every split view should have it's own search option?


The way it's done can be really usefull.
If you want to see I can show you a typicall use case :

Let's say you want to burn an mp3 cd and have to chose a lot of songs (or want to add a lot of songs to playing now or whatever you want).
- Set a view to your library and let the other set to the playlist (or playing now)
- Type "Alanis Morisette" (or whatever artist you want if you don't like Alanis ;)) in the search field
This way you can see all alanis songs currently in your playlist (or playing now) and choose to remove some or add more.

Quote
Now it is impossible to drag the found song (in view 2) to the correct spot in Playing Now (view 1).
Are you sure? I didn't tryed recently but I'm pretty sure it worked before. If it don't work anymore then :
- It can be a bug
- The above use case don't work anymore too
- I'm agree with you (the search filtering all views is useless)
- It's too bad :'(

David
Logged
A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard.

Dutch Peter

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 618
  • Carpe Diem
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #7 on: April 07, 2005, 10:41:03 am »

Quote
Dragging and dropping between two split views works, so long as there's no text in the search field.
I tried this and you are right, UNFORTUNATELY.
More and more I am missing the point of having more views.
For me it was the biggest drive to upgrade to MC11.
If you share this please respond! Doing so we can pursuade Jim and his colleages to build these typical 'multiple view functionalities' into a next release.

Peter
Logged
Stupid questions do not exist, only stupid answers.

CDvd

  • Regular Member
  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #8 on: April 08, 2005, 02:09:48 am »

Dragging and dropping between two split views works, so long as there's no text in the search field.
With text in the search field, it will not work.
[...]
Also bear in mind that it's quite possible that this is by design.

Too bad it doesn't work anymore!

I think every user, from the basic one to the MC-expert, will still try to drag and drop files between two split views, even if there's some text typed in the search field. Not allowing this IMO results in a strange behavior.
The user have to clear the search field if he want to be able to drag and drop a file. This defeats the purpose of the search field! ?

It sounds Not pratical, Not logical and Not intuitive to me, but I'm perhaps missing something?
I hope that the reason it doesn't work is because it's not an trivial modification (and not because it's by design)

David.
Logged
A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard.

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42325
  • Shoes gone again!
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #9 on: April 08, 2005, 07:05:09 am »

Search is global to all views by design.

Dropping to an ordered list that is filtered by a search isn't possible, since it's ambiguous what it would mean.

For view specific searches, you can use Ctrl+Q.
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

CDvd

  • Regular Member
  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 208
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #10 on: April 08, 2005, 07:55:07 am »

Search is global to all views by design.

I'm OK with that :)

Quote
Dropping to an ordered list that is filtered by a search isn't possible, since it's ambiguous what it would mean.

I think it should insert the file :
- respectfully to the order of the ordered list (if it's ordered by any Item like artist,name,rating...) if there is one
- just after the dropped position in a arbitrairy ordered list
- at the end of the list in a arbitrary ordered list (if there are no items shown due to the filter)

I think it's not very clear, and if it's not a definitive no on your side, I will make some mockups to illustrate what a "not ambiguous" behavior would be... :)

David


Logged
A computer without COBOL and Fortran is like a piece of chocolate cake without ketchup and mustard.

JimH

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 72380
  • Where did I put my teeth?
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #11 on: April 08, 2005, 08:05:41 am »

I'm sorry, but there will be no more changes to MC11 at this time.  Once we release 11.0, we'll consider it.
Logged

Dutch Peter

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 618
  • Carpe Diem
Re: MC11 Feature request for split views
« Reply #12 on: April 08, 2005, 08:55:58 am »

I understand that it is by design and that you want to freeze the current version.
I sincerely hope you will consider to upgrade the fucntionality around split views in 11.1.x!!

Ctrl-Q is a possibility, but it is a poor alternative.

The Library Browser looks more promising, beause you can filter in that view and still drag a song to the second view.
Disadvantage is that the Library Browser seems to have a fixed configuration?
See also this thread http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=26950.msg186808#msg186808

Is that also by design?

Peter
Logged
Stupid questions do not exist, only stupid answers.
Pages: [1]   Go Up