INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Incremental Updates  (Read 1821 times)

floppydisc

  • Regular Member
  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 20
Incremental Updates
« on: February 02, 2006, 09:54:20 am »

Hi,

I was just wondering why MC does not use incremental updates. They would make it much easier for you - the developers - and the users. It would also save a lot of bandwidth.
A simple but reliable approach would be to store all files (gzip compressed) server side together with a list of MD5 checksums. When the client/user selects Update (or an auto update runs) it just compares all checksums and downloads the files that have unequal checksums. That would also have the side effect of being a repair function for a damaged install.
Ever version could have it's own files and MD5 lists - for example MC11_Retail, MC11_Dev. The Retail version only includes the non-beta files and the Dev version includes the most recent (beta/release candidate) files. So on update the user can choose if he wants to try the beta or stay with the retail line.
That is not a true incremental update system but would still save a lot time and bandwidth.

Any thoughts?
Logged

JimH

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 72436
  • Where did I put my teeth?
Re: Incremental Updates
« Reply #1 on: February 02, 2006, 10:00:13 am »

We did it years ago, but it was a lot of work to keep up to date.  High speed connections are the future so it's less relevant than it was.
Logged

GHammer

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1930
  • Stereotypes are a real timesaver!
Re: Incremental Updates
« Reply #2 on: February 02, 2006, 09:53:27 pm »

Pretty popular though.
MS spent lots of time on it recently for their updates.
Likewise firefox.

Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up