Why Dem's attempt to shine a light on this will probably back fire:
http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/la-na-civil25jan25,0,5547867.story?coll=la-news-politics-national
I don't consider myself a Democrat. Most of the time I split the ticket, and tend to vote Republican/Conservative for local politics and Liberal/Democrat for national ones. I'm basically your run of the mill radical socially-liberal, environmentally-green, died-in-the-wool fiscally conservative, teacher-hating, gun-toting, back-woods, constitution and freedom loving libertarian.
On the point of this article I strongly disagree. They should be afraid of the counter-attack? That's utterly absurd. Because it worked so well so far to play nice and fair on the national security question?
These people are, IMHO, hurting America. The Dems (or
anyone else please!) need to stand up and tell them that what they are doing is (a) un-American because it robs us of the very freedoms the terrorists are trying to destroy, (b) counter productive because they are the "easy fixes" and are therefore easy for the terrorists to evade, and (c) counter productive because it wastes money when real things still need to be done (4.5 years later and they could still do the same thing in any port city with a cargo carrier). They need to tell them that it is not okay, and that we will not sit idly by. They need to take a stand, if not for this then what else?
(Wow.... The DRM thing got me all riled up tonight. Sorry everyone.)