Topic: library/db structure v.8 vs v.9 (Read 838 times)

Xstatic · « **on:** September 10, 2002, 12:04:15 pm »

Due to both hd crashes and a recent motherboard crash, I am basically starting from scratch to re-create all of my music files.

Though a catastrophe, it also present me with some possibillities to correct earlier flaws in ripping, encoding, file structure etc.

Regarding database - would you (matt, nikolay) advice to wait until there is an actual v.9 beta, or wouldnt it matter?

At present I use all three custom fields, I encode in mpc format, so I presently can't use notes or lyrics.

Will there be more expanded options regarding fields, that are not saved in the file but in the database in v.9?

Jesper.

Matt · « **Reply #1 on:** September 10, 2002, 12:47:14 pm »

Your best bet is to use version 8 for now. The database for version 9 is still changing a lot, and you'll probably have to start afresh for each of the next few previews.

Also, MPC should support any database fields in version 9 -- it just needs a minor update and you'll need to enable APE tagging.

Thanks.

-Matt

INTERACT FORUM

Author Topic: library/db structure v.8 vs v.9 (Read 838 times)

Xstatic

library/db structure v.8 vs v.9

Matt

RE:library/db structure v.8 vs v.9