In my opinion there is one that is a fact:ORG sounds better than mp3
I agree with what you're saying, but remember it's OGG, not ORG.
sure there is only one player playing ORG at this time,but the final product is just out
Not quite correct. I assume you mean MJ when you talk about "only one player", but the latest versions of Winamp and Coolplayer also support OGG "out of the box" (well, there is no box, but you know what I mean), without any additional tools or plugins required.
There is a lot of implications with ORG
let say you have a band and your band and other bands of your town would like to have a site with load of songs to download.
If you use ORG ,you do not have to pay as for mp3.
That's correct, and that's a major advantage of OGG. Not only is the software open source, but the format itself is completely open and royalty- and patent-free, unlike MP3.
Check out the
FAQ.
Some more things I wanted to mention about OGG:
There is no hardware support yet (except for the Phatbox), but I think (hope) that it will arrive soon. That's also why I signed
this petition.
A few words about the quality: IMHO, Vorbis at "normal" bitrates (q5, equivalent to about 140-150 kbps) sounds about as good as MP3 at --alt-preset standard, which generates MP3s with bitrates over 200kbps. And OGG at -q0, with bitrates mostly lower than 64kbps sounds very impressive if you take the enormous compression ratio into account.
OGG also solves some of the inherent shortcomings of the MP3 format. For example, it is less problematic with very fast attack/impulses in music, like the infamous fatboy sample (the beginning of "Kalifornia" by Fatboy Slim). Also, gapless playback is perfect with OGG, unlike MP3. See also my post in
this thread.