INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination  (Read 2377 times)

benn600

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3849
  • Living: Santa Monica CA Hometown: Cedar Rapids IA
Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination
« on: July 17, 2009, 11:57:08 pm »
It wouldn't hurt to add terabyte (and petabyte) to the space calculation processes.  I really don't like seeing non-formatted numbers in general (anywhere) ie: 10000 vs. 10,000 [more difficult to read].  But obviously, the most appropriate denomination would resolve this issue too.  Thanks.

Logged

hit_ny

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3310
  • nothing more to say...
Re: Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination
« Reply #1 on: July 18, 2009, 03:15:29 pm »
Heh, i've felt the same thing about the status bar where it indicates how many files there are.
Logged

benn600

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3849
  • Living: Santa Monica CA Hometown: Cedar Rapids IA
Re: Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination
« Reply #2 on: July 18, 2009, 03:44:51 pm »
I know.  I really don't like non-formatted numbers.  I can read my screens fine unless there's a long block of numbers, then I have to get close to carefully examine the digit groups.
Logged

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42797
  • Shoes gone again!
Re: Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination
« Reply #3 on: July 21, 2009, 11:22:35 am »
You win the prize for biggest drive.

Coming soon:
Changed: When displaying file sizes over 1000 GB, TB (Terabytes) will be used (i.e. 1.3 TB instead of 1300.0 GB).
Changed: When displaying file sizes over 1000 TB, PB (Petabytes) will be used.

We have an office pool about how long before you outgrow it again ;)

Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

benn600

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3849
  • Living: Santa Monica CA Hometown: Cedar Rapids IA
Re: Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination
« Reply #4 on: July 21, 2009, 11:43:49 am »
Quote
We have an office pool about how long before you outgrow it again Wink

Oh, great.  I always enjoy hearing talks of bets around the forum.

My uncle bet me about getting Blu-Ray on it before Christmas.  At 50GB per disc, yikes.

The previous 7TB lasted 2 years--or 1.5 realistic years.  I was pushing it the last 6 months.  This is 31.5TB total (4.5 times the space).

Pictures & Build Log:
http://yabb.jriver.com/interact/index.php?topic=52549.0

For looking back on later, currently "Beryllium" (this massive drive) is at:
Used: 6.85 TB
Free: 21.7 TB
Cap: 28.6 TB  (31.5TB measured by HDD mfr)
Logged

MrHaugen

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3774
Re: Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination
« Reply #5 on: July 21, 2009, 11:47:38 am »
Quote from: Matt on July 21, 2009, 11:22:35 am
We have an office pool about how long before you outgrow it again ;)

Looking forward to that day my self :)

Any chance you could add some kind of spacing in other numbers as well? Number of tracks, albums etc. Like 15 000 or 15,000? It's just a bit hard to read the numbers when there's a lot of digits.
Logged
- I may not always believe what I'm saying

benn600

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3849
  • Living: Santa Monica CA Hometown: Cedar Rapids IA
Re: Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination
« Reply #6 on: July 21, 2009, 11:52:26 am »
We need a larger denomination for INTEGERS!  15000 songs = 15 Ksongs.

15 Tsongs

LOL
Logged

hit_ny

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3310
  • nothing more to say...
Re: Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination
« Reply #7 on: July 23, 2009, 03:17:48 pm »
Umm no, i'd want to see 15,000 files

A point, Matt's post did not indicate.
Logged

Daydream

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 778
Re: Low Priority - Terabyte Denomination
« Reply #8 on: July 23, 2009, 03:36:13 pm »
Quote from: MrHaugen on July 21, 2009, 11:47:38 am
Looking forward to that day my self :)

Now if we can put together a container data center, Google-style...:)
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »