INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Any Plans on Changing the Artist Field into a List rather than a String?  (Read 1716 times)

Afrosheen

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 313

Hi, I was wondering if it's possible to change the artist field into a list rather than a string?  Could I also ask as to why it cannot be changed?  Thanks in advance!
Logged

Afrosheen

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
Re: Any Plans on Changing the Artist Field into a List rather than a String?
« Reply #1 on: September 15, 2009, 01:44:07 am »

I found this thread that touches this subject, but have yet found any news updating whether it would be a feature that would be considered.  Basically what would be nice would be that the artist field would be a normal list instead of a string, and to maintain compatibility the first artist will be the artist that would be used.  Though in Media Center we would find who all the artists are. 
Logged

bunglemebaby

  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 469
Re: Any Plans on Changing the Artist Field into a List rather than a String?
« Reply #2 on: September 15, 2009, 06:09:31 am »

My understanding is that it's not ever going to happen. The difficulties that would arise with a list based Artist field seem to heavily outweigh the benefits from what the devs and others have mentioned previously. Also, the devs seem very against the notion.

One trick you can use is to create two more Artist fields. One called [Additional Artists] and another called [Artists] (with the 's') (or choose names that you like  :D). Have both of them be list type fields. Fill in the [Add'l Artists] manually and create an expression to fill in [Artists] automatically with a combination of [Artist] and [Additional Artists]. It should just be =[Artist];[Additional Artists] (you might have to toy with this, I'm not around MC right now). Then you can use the [Artists] field instead of the [Artist] field, it will be list type and will still use any imported [Artist] data. It's a tad more work than an ideal solution, but not much.

-JB
Logged

dcwebman

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 2153
Re: Any Plans on Changing the Artist Field into a List rather than a String?
« Reply #3 on: September 15, 2009, 07:07:25 am »

I also just have the [Artists] field created but that's the only one. After I import and get the [Artist] correct, I use Move/Copy Fields to copy the value from [Artist] to [Artists]. Then if there are other artists, I just add them to that one field and then use [Artists] everywhere instead of [Artist].
Logged
Jeff

gappie

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 4565
Re: Any Plans on Changing the Artist Field into a List rather than a String?
« Reply #4 on: September 15, 2009, 07:25:26 am »

i also use an artists field. i actually think the seperation is handy. in the artist field i put the artist as on the cover, in the artists field i put the artists i want the record to be filed under. so for instance the artist is: bill frisell quartet, artists: bill frisell
or artist: bill frisell & petra haden, artists: bill frisell;petra haden

both different artist can now be found under the artists bill frisell, the artist tag under the album shows with what band the record was made.
for me the result is clear and clean.

 :)
gab
Logged

Afrosheen

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 313
Re: Any Plans on Changing the Artist Field into a List rather than a String?
« Reply #5 on: September 15, 2009, 08:03:04 am »

Nice, I like these ideas better than what I wanted.  Thank you very much for the responses. 
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up