INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: MEDIA JUKE 7 LAME vs EAC LAME 3.91  (Read 785 times)

dpbeatley

  • Regular Member
  • Junior Woodchuck
  • **
  • Posts: 50
MEDIA JUKE 7 LAME vs EAC LAME 3.91
« on: March 29, 2002, 06:20:04 am »

Has anyone compared the results of LAME 3.88 used in MEDIA JUKEBOX with that used by EAC - LAME v 3.91? The EAC version seems slower than the v3.88 plug-in but reviews say that the 3.91 external version is better, especially in the area of "clicks and pops". Opinions greatly appreciated. My goal is quality rather than speed.

-dennis
Logged

Durgame

  • Guest
RE:MEDIA JUKE 7 LAME vs EAC LAME 3.91
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2002, 06:30:13 am »

You must set the compression options the same
to even start to compare.  VBR takes a lot longer
than CBR.  Go with the new version - much improved
in the VBR quality.  New Lame supports macro settings,
but available in MJ only in External Encoder selection.

Durgame
Logged

Sentient

  • Regular Member
  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 35
  • AerospaceSpace, Folk Music
RE:MEDIA JUKE 7 LAME vs EAC LAME 3.91
« Reply #2 on: April 01, 2002, 01:06:04 pm »

I have used external lame 3.91 with both.  I am quite happy with its performance.  using the "--alt-preset fast standard" command line it tends to encode at about 1x to 1.5x on my PII 333MHz machine.  Since EAC will queue external encodes accross multiple CD rips, I can rip 4-5 discs at 1.5 - 2.5x, select shutdown on the last rip and go to bed.   EAC will finish all encodes and then gracefully turn the computer off.  With this feature you could even use "--alt-preset standard" which is much slower but better quality, if you want.

Sentient

p.s.  I have this in the wish list for MJ, but no one is voting for it.
Logged
Sentient,

and darn proud of it.
Pages: [1]   Go Up