INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Reaction time Crossfade  (Read 1570 times)

bennyd

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1307
  • Project Leader
Reaction time Crossfade
« on: March 11, 2002, 11:11:00 pm »

I have my crossfade turned on as aggressive and 7 seconds.
When I click next (for the next song), it takes a few seconds before the next song starts.
On what is this based on how long it takes before the song starts and/or is this influencable ?

My gues is it has to buffer the MP3 into memory the moment you click next.
If so, can't it buffer the next song in the playlist automatic the moment a song starts to play ?
See products like "BPM Studio" (is not competition, is only meant for in bars or clubs) which does that.

What do you think ?
Logged
may U live 2 see the dawn

bennyd :-)

Scronch

  • Guest
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2002, 11:30:41 pm »

BPM Studio may not be direct competition, but I think it's GUI is worth a look.
Maybe it's a little complicated, but the general look is attractive.  Although
I do hate green text on a black background.



Scronch
Logged

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42389
  • Shoes gone again!
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2002, 04:26:52 am »

That latency is exactly what Options -> Playback -> Advanced -> More Skip Resistant vs. More Responsive controls.

We error on the side of skip resistance by default, so it's probably a good idea to tweak the setting.

-Matt
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

Markus

  • Guest
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2002, 05:03:16 am »

Couldn't MJ start playing immediately and buffer a large amount ahead anyway afterwards? I'd like MJ to react as quick as in V7 but I hate clicks and pops while playing...
Logged

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42389
  • Shoes gone again!
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2002, 05:16:55 am »

It's not quite that simple.  You have to keep the soundcard fed, and basically once you give the soundcard some data, there's no getting it back.  So if that buffer isn't big enough, the sound card goes hungry during high CPU usage and sputters.  That's what the performance slider adjusts.

On the other hand, the read-ahead buffering is automatically allocated by MJ to be optimal -- and this isn't ever the issue with latency problems.

Take care.

-Matt
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

bennyd

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1307
  • Project Leader
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2002, 05:48:01 am »

Thanks Matt,

I forgot the latency option, all working fine now
Logged
may U live 2 see the dawn

bennyd :-)

Scronch

  • Guest
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2002, 11:10:33 am »

Cool.  Now what do people think of the look.  Is it "dowdy"?

Logged

Scronch

  • Guest
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2002, 11:48:59 pm »

I must apologize for not infusing this thread with socio-economic multi-cultural blather.  I promise to try harder next time.

Scronch
Logged

Severian

  • Guest
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #8 on: March 13, 2002, 03:35:09 am »

Not dowdy. More winampy.
Logged

bennyd

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1307
  • Project Leader
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #9 on: March 13, 2002, 05:16:08 am »

Version 4.2 has skins and is much nicer
Logged
may U live 2 see the dawn

bennyd :-)

Scronch

  • Guest
RE:Reaction time Crossfade
« Reply #10 on: March 13, 2002, 08:48:46 am »

"winampy" is now an acceptable adjective!  And the sad part is, I knew exactly what I meant.

I need to go away from this for a while.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up