INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Improved audio analysis?? Please bring back intensity.  (Read 2264 times)

GreggP

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Improved audio analysis?? Please bring back intensity.
« on: February 14, 2014, 01:52:26 pm »

I really appreciate all the new improvements with v19's audio analysis feature. However, I seem to have lost some functionality with these changes.

Before v19 forced me to re-analyze all my tracks with the new capabilities, I used the BPM an Intensity tags in smart playlists to generate a list of "mellow" songs. Something like:

BPM <= 75 and Intensity <=2

worked pretty well.

When Intensity disappeared, my smart playlists generated empty lists. So I had to come up with a different way to define "mellow". After a little research, I read a recommendation to use a high dynamic range, because that probably means the track has more quiet passages. However, that doesn't seem to work in this example. I seem to have quite a few loudish tracks with a high dynamic range.

Could you please bring back the Intensity analysis? Pretty please???

Thanks.
Logged

GreggP

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Re:
« Reply #1 on: June 18, 2014, 05:25:48 pm »

I posted this message/request a long time ago. By now, I figured it's been long forgotten... Bump???
Logged

thediscman

  • Regular Member
  • Junior Woodchuck
  • **
  • Posts: 51
  • Change this by choosing profile
Re: Improved audio analysis?? Please bring back intensity.
« Reply #2 on: June 18, 2014, 06:08:03 pm »

I hadn't used this before, but it would certainly be nice to have.
Logged

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42336
  • Shoes gone again!
Re: Improved audio analysis?? Please bring back intensity.
« Reply #3 on: June 20, 2014, 12:43:03 pm »

Sorry, but intensity is gone for good.  Looking at the Dynamic Range is a good compromise.
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

GreggP

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Re: Re: Re: Improved audio analysis?? Please bring back intensity.
« Reply #4 on: June 20, 2014, 12:57:44 pm »

Sorry, but intensity is gone for good.  Looking at the Dynamic Range is a good compromise.
First, welcome back!! It's great to see you posting again.

Can you give me a little more guidance on how to use dynamic range to identify mellow tracks?

I've tried tracks with large dynamic ranges, but they're not necessarily mellow. I wish there was a better way or combination of attributes that could be used that replace intensity. I used it for generating both relaxing playlists and party or workout type playlists. I suppose intensity might not have been really accurate, but if seems to have worked better than dynamic range does now. Just curious, what values were used to calculate the old intensity attribute/tag?
Logged

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42336
  • Shoes gone again!
Re: Re: Re: Improved audio analysis?? Please bring back intensity.
« Reply #5 on: June 20, 2014, 01:29:27 pm »

Can you give me a little more guidance on how to use dynamic range to identify mellow tracks?

This Smartlist is a start:
[Volume Level (R128)]=<-10 [Dynamic Range (R128)]=>=10
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

GreggP

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 321

This Smartlist is a start:
[Volume Level (R128)]=<-10 [Dynamic Range (R128)]=>=10
is that volume level (R128) less than our equal to -10 or +10?
Logged

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42336
  • Shoes gone again!

Less than or equal to -10.  You want songs without too much volume.
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

GreggP

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Re:
« Reply #8 on: June 20, 2014, 01:53:04 pm »

OK thanks a lot!
Logged

MrC

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 10462
  • Your life is short. Give me your money.
Re: Improved audio analysis?? Please bring back intensity.
« Reply #9 on: June 20, 2014, 01:53:54 pm »

Minor correction:

   =< is less than
   =<= is less than or equal to

   http://wiki.jriver.com/index.php/Smartlist_and_Search_-_Rules_and_Modifiers#Comparison_Operators
Logged
The opinions I express represent my own folly.

GreggP

  • Regular Member
  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 321
Re:
« Reply #10 on: June 20, 2014, 03:16:19 pm »

One more quick question (sorry): Why does volume level (128) have a negative value? Does a number greater than 0 mean it is pretty loud?
Logged

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 42336
  • Shoes gone again!
Re:
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2014, 03:18:32 pm »

One more quick question (sorry): Why does volume level (128) have a negative value? Does a number greater than 0 mean it is pretty loud?

Yes.  The value is the change required to bring the track into the R128 volume level.  It's lower than most tracks, so it's a negative number of decibels.
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center
Pages: [1]   Go Up