INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Further development of JRSS?  (Read 5422 times)

thorsten

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 194
Further development of JRSS?
« on: March 23, 2014, 02:27:10 pm »

Hi everybody,

I use MC for my 7.1 home cinema, including 3 subs and full activated center/surrounds. Everything is set up with acourate convolving and works flawless!
I really like the surround field that is provided by JRSS!

But, as always  ::). I'm looking for further enhancements of my system. All speakers are selfbuilt with Visaton-chassis and I still have some chassis spare....

So, are there any plans for including a 3D-sound enhancer like Prologic 2z or DTS Neo-X?

Regards,

Thorsten
Logged

Trumpetguy

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 974
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2014, 03:40:21 pm »

Or height channels in front. Seemed to be the best thing ever when receivers got it a couple of years ago.

I have a similar setup, and will soon have a couple of decent, very small speakers available.
Logged

sirkus

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #2 on: March 23, 2014, 03:56:37 pm »

+1
Front height/presence speakers support would be cool :) Most of the recent amps support it.
Logged

Trumpetguy

  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 974
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2014, 11:37:01 am »

+1
Front height/presence speakers support would be cool :) Most of the recent amps support it.

Just to be clear, what I was thinking of was JRSS to do mixing similar to what newer receivers do. As an alternative to the ones (like me) that does not have a receiver between JRiver and the amps.
Logged

SpeedD408

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 150
Re: Re: Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2014, 08:43:37 pm »

Just to be clear, what I was thinking of was JRSS to do mixing similar to what newer receivers do. As an alternative to the ones (like me) that does not have a receiver between JRiver and the amps.

I'm in this boat too and would love high/wide support.
Logged
Media PC: Ryzen 3900X, Asus ROG Crosshair VIII Hero, 16GB RAM, Sabrent 1TB Rocket NVMe PCIe 4.0, NVidia 1070 GPU
Software: JRiver MC 26.0.22, AnyDVD HD 8.4.4.0
Audio Processor: Lynx AES16e (FW: 14.1) w/ Aurora 16-VT (FW: 31)
Amp: Emotiva MPS-2
Speakers: Ascend Acoustics Sierra Towers w/RAAL & Horizon w/RAAL and Sierra-2's as surrounds
Sub: Dual Rythmik Audio FV15HP
TV Tuner: HD HomeRun Prime

njoak

  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 21
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2014, 03:03:01 am »

+1
Logged

sirkus

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2014, 02:35:19 pm »

Quote
Front height/presence speakers support would be cool Smiley Most of the recent amps support it.

Quote
Just to be clear, what I was thinking of was JRSS to do mixing similar to what newer receivers do. As an alternative to the ones (like me) that does not have a receiver between JRiver and the amps.

Yes, that's what I was thinking :) It was only for a comparison of something that is missing in MC compared to hardware.
Logged

sirkus

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #7 on: April 21, 2014, 11:26:49 pm »

Another request for JRSS, would be a 2.0/2.1 to 3.0/3.1 mode for fronts+center.
Logged

flac.rules

  • Regular Member
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2014, 01:19:17 am »

It would also be nice to get some technical details about what theory governs how JRSSS splits the signal and adds extra information, I understand that a complete rundown of the algorithm might be too much, but a general description of the principles used would be nice, so one can know if they are sound.
Logged

Blaine78

  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 472
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #9 on: April 22, 2014, 01:44:12 am »

For a 2 channel setup, be great to have 'wide surround' effect processing on rear channel mixdown. Would give a phantom surround type effect on a 2 channel stereo.
Logged
Windows 10 | Sony 55W805C TV | Metrum Acoustics Musette DAC | Luxman L-550AX | PMC Twenty.23

packux

  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 43
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #10 on: April 22, 2014, 04:31:34 am »

For a 2 channel setup, be great to have 'wide surround' effect processing on rear channel mixdown. Would give a phantom surround type effect on a 2 channel stereo.

+1 on this one, I am currently working with a 3.1 set-up and even If I ever set-up a 5.1 I would still love to have a phantom surround effect while watching content in my living room and not in the home cinema.
Logged

mojave

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3732
  • Requires "iTunes or better" so I installed JRiver
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #11 on: April 22, 2014, 05:07:29 pm »

For a 2 channel setup, be great to have 'wide surround' effect processing on rear channel mixdown. Would give a phantom surround type effect on a 2 channel stereo.
Try Effects > Surround Field in the DSP. 
Logged

Blaine78

  • Galactic Citizen
  • ****
  • Posts: 472
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #12 on: April 22, 2014, 05:40:11 pm »

Try Effects > Surround Field in the DSP.  

Would this affect front and centre channels? Keeping the front and centre channel tracks pure, and adding a wide phase type effect to only rear/side tracks would be more natural, would create the illusion of phantom rear/side on a 2 channel stereo system.
Logged
Windows 10 | Sony 55W805C TV | Metrum Acoustics Musette DAC | Luxman L-550AX | PMC Twenty.23

sirkus

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 121
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #13 on: May 22, 2014, 04:42:55 pm »

Back to this one with some news. 9.1 is coming :)

2L release (9.1 Auro-3D 96kHz/24bit ):
https://shop.klicktrack.com/2l/1001153

The technology:
http://www.auro-3d.com/system/creative-tool-suite
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Auro_11.1

Again, it would be cool if JRiver could support 9.1 upmixing.
How does it upmix if I select 10 channels?
Logged

fitbrit

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 4877
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #14 on: June 25, 2014, 12:14:37 am »

Dolby Atmos AVRs announced by Onkyo yesterday too:
http://dolbyatmos.onkyousa.com/
Logged

mojave

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 3732
  • Requires "iTunes or better" so I installed JRiver
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #15 on: June 25, 2014, 12:18:20 am »

How does it upmix if I select 10 channels?
It upmixes to 7.1. The higher channel counts are used for active crossovers, extra subwoofers, extra side surrounds, etc.
Logged

Matt

  • Administrator
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 41958
  • Shoes gone again!
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #16 on: June 25, 2014, 09:25:54 am »

For now, outputting more than 7.1 is possible using DSP Studio > Output Format > Channels and then using Parametric Equalizer to fill the additional channels.
Logged
Matt Ashland, JRiver Media Center

retro

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 116
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #17 on: June 25, 2014, 02:48:04 pm »

Quote
For now

That sounds promising.. ;)
Logged

thorsten

  • World Citizen
  • ***
  • Posts: 194
Re: Further development of JRSS?
« Reply #18 on: August 16, 2014, 03:20:43 pm »

For now, outputting more than 7.1 is possible using DSP Studio > Output Format > Channels and then using Parametric Equalizer to fill the additional channels.
Hi,
I already use 12ch Output for 3 dedicated Subs and active center. The mixing is done via convolving (txt-file) with a total of 18 steps ;)
It. is also possible to mix e.g. The Surround and backsuround in a dedicated Channel for filling between them in the Edge.

But, what I/we Need Are New Algorithm for the new setups. Hopefully they will be rather Soon available.

Regards,

Thorsten
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up