INTERACT FORUM

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: What is the best compromise between sound quality and file size?  (Read 713 times)

dennisbrooks2

  • Guest
What is the best compromise between sound quality and file size?
« on: February 15, 2002, 10:24:15 am »
My handheld supports both WMA and mp3, so I can use either. What have you found is the best sound vs. file size combination. Which encoding and at what bitrate gives the most bang for the buck?

Thanks
Logged

Doof

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 5907
  • Farm Animal Stupid
RE:What is the best compromise between sound quality and file size?
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2002, 10:55:33 am »
LAME MP3 VBR.

More specifically with these LAME commandline switches

"--nspsytune --vbr-mtrh -V1 -mj -h -b96 --lowpass 19.5 --athtype 3 --ns-sfb21 2 -Z --scale 0.98 -X0"

or just "--r3mix" for short.

If you're using MJ 7.2, then download the lame.exe and use MJ's external encoder. If you're using 8.0.206, then use MJ's MP3 encoder, and configure it for those options.
Logged

Doof

  • MC Beta Team
  • Citizen of the Universe
  • *****
  • Posts: 5907
  • Farm Animal Stupid
RE:What is the best compromise between sound quality and file size?
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2002, 10:56:27 am »
http://r3mix.net

You can find more info about those command line switches I mentioned at that site.
Logged

Blaine

  • Regular Member
  • Recent member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
  • Software Engineer
RE:What is the best compromise between sound quality and file size?
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2002, 08:36:57 pm »
Well, my money is on the WMA.  I used VBR (not the Lame, but Xing and Fraunhofer or however you spell it) and felt that a wide stereo image was more stable with WMA.  Additionally, I thought the high end was also better with WMA.

So my recommendation is to experiment for yourself.
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »