Not sure if this is a bug or if this is functioning as intended, but I wanted to ask.
When you use the "Rename" subfunction of "Rename, Move, & Copy Files" on a video file, JRiver renames or moves the video file and any other associated files in the directory (i.e. the sidecar and the associated image). This is ideal (from my perspective) as it keeps the tags with the file, leaves no orphans, etc.
However, when you use the "Copy and Update Database to Point to a New Location" subfunction on a video file, JRiver copies the video file, but does not appear to be copying any associated files.
This seems anomalous to me: this specific sub-function points the library to the newly copied file, so you'd expect that the sidecar or other library created files would also be copied. There may be some reason I'm not thinking of why this behavior would be undesirable?
I'm attempting to use the function as part of a workflow that creates fully redundant data, so my ideal behavior would be:
1) All ancillary files copy over with the main file, and
2) Are not removed from their original location.
(i.e. full copy of the main file and any helper files).