More > JRiver Media Center 21 for Windows

A qucik Explanation Please

<< < (2/2)

TopDownDriver:
Under what criteria do you define "better"?

To my ears, and to many in the audiophile community who use JRiver, WMA Lossless sounds MUCH better.  Hoping that the built in Windows FLAC codec also sounds good as well.

DarkPenguin:
Love audiophiles.  They so crazy.

glynor:

--- Quote from: DarkPenguin on August 11, 2015, 09:29:45 pm ---Love audiophiles.  They so crazy.

--- End quote ---

 ;D ;D ;D

Awesome Donkey:

--- Quote from: TopDownDriver on August 11, 2015, 04:45:29 pm ---Under what criteria do you define "better"?
--- End quote ---

Because it's the official, reference version?


--- Quote from: TopDownDriver on August 11, 2015, 04:45:29 pm ---To my ears, and to many in the audiophile community who use JRiver, WMA Lossless sounds MUCH better.
--- End quote ---

*If* WMA Lossless is better to your ears, why not just keep using that?


--- Quote from: DarkPenguin on August 11, 2015, 09:29:45 pm ---Love audiophiles.  They so crazy.

--- End quote ---

You sir win the thread.



Sorry, I couldn't resist. :-[

Hendrik:
Lossless formats are called lossless because they are just that, lossless. The end result is identical.

Anway, going to close this thread. We have no plans whatsoever to use the Microsoft decoder.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[*] Previous page