I finally got around to upgrading to Media Center 14. It did indeed fix the problem with my iPod. Therefore, this was apparently not a problem with Apple changing the firmware on my iPod, but must have been some sort of bug in version 13. Or it was just unlucky (i.e. it was version 13 after all).
So, let's talk a bit more about technical support before I go. I have no issues with using this forum as a technical support vehicle as I've said before in this thread. However, I do feel that the level of diagnostic activity is severely limited on this "technical support vehicle". It would've been nice if there were actual diagnostic activity (i.e. reviewing logs, etc.) that would've correctly identified that my problem was due to Apple "breaking" my firmware and not something else that could've been (and was, apparently) corrected in version 14. In fact, the diagnostic activity may well have been able to tell what in version 14 would've been corrected to fix the problem by actually identifying the problem through the review of objective material rather than supposition. If I had had information that indicated that version 14 would probably fix the problem, I would've hastened the upgrade a bit. As it was, I had no reason to think that the upgrade was going to fix my problem, and I just did it when I got around to it.
Don't get me wrong. I really like this product and I've pretty much bought every version since 9 I think. But your technical support really needs to be a little more systematic and include diagnostic activities when a problem is encountered that is out of the ordinary. I wonder how many other "supported iPod" problems have been incorrectly lumped into the "Apple firmware" problem and declared "unsupported" as a result without a shred of objective evidence (i.e. log information, etc.) to support it?
This is, however, the second time that I've had a problem that was never diagnosed. The previous instance (i.e. running MC on Windows 2000 Server when I was told Windows Server is not supported because it is so different, which it is not that different, of course) I just worked around by moving the software to a Windows XP workstation and using mapped drives so I could use the disk space of the server, which was the goal. Two bugs with no resolution in close to 10 years of use is not all that bad and is a testament to the quality code development, quality control procedures, and release management that your company puts into this product. However, your technical support processes cry out for better diagnostic activities.
Please take this comment as it is intended... a helpful suggestion for improvement. Nobody's perfect you know.
Dale Engle
Tampa, FL