That would kind of destroy the whole purpose of having a server. I need the sync and update of play counters and similar. Without it I would constantly have problems remembering what I have seen, and much of my smartlists for audio would be no good.
This is the exact reason why I was concerned about the Server/Client setup a long time ago. Who would want to have several separate libraries? Not many I think. Are my setup really so strange? One server to serve all my needs, and a client to play back those needs. And I want to use a remote control to play music on the client without having to turn the TV on. I can't imagine I'm the only one with those wishes. Now, the usage of Gizmo is just cut in half. Even more because of the fact that I sync my phone and play things locally. So, it's rather useless for me. Only time I think I would be using it is in the summer when I sit in my back yard and want to listen to some new music while I take a beer or two.
Again I'm raising the question of why the DLNA/Web features is to closely tied to the Library Server functionality. That you can't mix this things in cases where you have more than one computer, is rather bad. I can't see any logical reasons why you could not use a Library Client with activated Library server functionality as a DLNA renderer, controller and serveris, as well as web server etc.